» Articles » PMID: 28351929

Genetic Heterogeneity in Therapy-Naïve Synchronous Primary Breast Cancers and Their Metastases

Abstract

Paired primary breast cancers and metachronous metastases after adjuvant treatment are reported to differ in their clonal composition and genetic alterations, but it is unclear whether these differences stem from the selective pressures of the metastatic process, the systemic therapies, or both. We sought to define the repertoire of genetic alterations in breast cancer patients with metastatic disease who had not received local or systemic therapy. Up to two anatomically distinct core biopsies of primary breast cancers and synchronous distant metastases from nine patients who presented with metastatic disease were subjected to high-depth whole-exome sequencing. Mutations, copy number alterations and their cancer cell fractions, and mutation signatures were defined using state-of-the-art bioinformatics methods. All mutations identified were validated with orthogonal methods. Genomic differences were observed between primary and metastatic deposits, with a median of 60% (range 6%-95%) of shared somatic mutations. Although mutations in known driver genes including , and were preferentially clonal in both sites, primary breast cancers and their synchronous metastases displayed spatial intratumor heterogeneity. Likely pathogenic mutations affecting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-related genes, including , and (), were found to be restricted to or enriched in the metastatic lesions. Mutational signatures of trunk mutations differed from those of mutations enriched in the primary tumor or the metastasis in six cases. Synchronous primary breast cancers and metastases differ in their repertoire of somatic genetic alterations even in the absence of systemic therapy. Mutational signature shifts might contribute to spatial intratumor genetic heterogeneity. .

Citing Articles

A network dynamic nomogram for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with breast cancer liver metastases: an analysis based on the SEER database.

Tian M, Wang K, Li M Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):845.

PMID: 39739079 PMC: 11683041. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01719-1.


Establishment of multiple machine learning prognostic model for gene differences between primary tumors and lymph nodes in luminal breast cancer.

Yue M, Zhao J, Wu S, Cai L, Wang X, Jia Y Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; .

PMID: 39656430 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07574-6.


Whole-tumoral metabolic heterogeneity in F-FDG PET/CT is a novel prognostic marker for neuroblastoma.

Liu J, Ren Q, Xiao H, Li S, Zheng L, Yang X Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):72.

PMID: 38863073 PMC: 11167917. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00718-3.


The enrichment of Fanconi anemia/homologous recombination pathway aberrations in ATM/ATR-mutated NSCLC was accompanied by unique molecular features and poor prognosis.

Wei W, Shi F, Xu Y, Jiao Y, Zhang Y, Ou Q J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):874.

PMID: 38041093 PMC: 10690992. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04634-1.


Predicting diagnosis and survival of bone metastasis in breast cancer using machine learning.

Zhong X, Lin Y, Zhang W, Bi Q Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18301.

PMID: 37880320 PMC: 10600146. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45438-z.


References
1.
Weinreb I, Piscuoglio S, Martelotto L, Waggott D, Ng C, Perez-Ordonez B . Hotspot activating PRKD1 somatic mutations in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinomas of the salivary glands. Nat Genet. 2014; 46(11):1166-9. PMC: 10208689. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3096. View

2.
Bertucci F, Finetti P, Guille A, Adelaide J, Garnier S, Carbuccia N . Comparative genomic analysis of primary tumors and metastases in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(19):27208-19. PMC: 5053643. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8349. View

3.
Yates L, Gerstung M, Knappskog S, Desmedt C, Gundem G, Van Loo P . Subclonal diversification of primary breast cancer revealed by multiregion sequencing. Nat Med. 2015; 21(7):751-9. PMC: 4500826. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3886. View

4.
Goswami R, Patel K, Singh R, Meric-Bernstam F, Kopetz E, Subbiah V . Hotspot mutation panel testing reveals clonal evolution in a study of 265 paired primary and metastatic tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(11):2644-51. PMC: 5015593. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2391. View

5.
Kovaleva V, Geissler A, Lutz L, Fritsch R, Makowiec F, Wiesemann S . Spatio-temporal mutation profiles of case-matched colorectal carcinomas and their metastases reveal unique de novo mutations in metachronous lung metastases by targeted next generation sequencing. Mol Cancer. 2016; 15(1):63. PMC: 5069823. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-016-0549-8. View