» Articles » PMID: 28298271

Optimizing Protein Intake in Adults: Interpretation and Application of the Recommended Dietary Allowance Compared with the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range

Overview
Journal Adv Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Mar 17
PMID 28298271
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The adult RDA is defined as the average daily level of intake sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all healthy people. The RDA for protein for adults ≥18 y of age (0.8 g/kg) has been essentially unchanged for >70 y. In practice, the RDA for protein was derived to estimate the minimum amount of protein that must be eaten to avoid a loss of body nitrogen. The Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) (10-35% of calories as protein) was developed to express dietary recommendations in the context of a complete diet. It is noteworthy that the lowest level of protein intake reflected in the AMDR is higher than that of the RDA. Furthermore, recent studies, particularly in older individuals, suggest specific health benefits at levels of protein intake that significantly exceed the RDA. Translation of protein intake recommendations for the general adult population into dietary guidance for individuals requires an understanding of the derivation and intended use of both the protein RDA and AMDR. The following discussion will describe limitations to the derivation and practical application of the RDA compared with the use of the AMDR to help maximize health benefits associated with higher protein intake by using flexible calories inherent in different dietary patterns.

Citing Articles

[A rapid review: quality of life in adult allogeneic kidney transplantation in the last five years : What can we learn?].

Brunaiova L, Cermak S, Koneval L, Roth B, Schneidewind L Urologie. 2025; .

PMID: 39878796 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02497-y.


Consideration of the role of protein quality in determining dietary protein recommendations.

Wolfe R, Church D, Ferrando A, Moughan P Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1389664.

PMID: 39606577 PMC: 11598328. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1389664.


Health and functional advantages of cheese containing soy protein and soybean-derived casein.

Messina M, Messina V Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1407506.

PMID: 39109061 PMC: 11300356. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1407506.


Strategies for Improving Firefighter Health On-Shift: A Review.

Wohlgemuth K, Conner M, Tinsley G, Palmer T, Mota J J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38921641 PMC: 11204757. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9020105.


Not Only Protein: Dietary Supplements to Optimize the Skeletal Muscle Growth Response to Resistance Training: The Current State of Knowledge.

Paoli A, Cerullo G, Bianco A, Neri M, Gennaro F, Charrier D J Hum Kinet. 2024; 91(Spec Issue):225-244.

PMID: 38689582 PMC: 11057611. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/18666.


References
1.
Weijs P, Wolfe R . Exploration of the protein requirement during weight loss in obese older adults. Clin Nutr. 2015; 35(2):394-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.02.016. View

2.
Asp M, Richardson J, Collene A, Droll K, Belury M . Dietary protein and beef consumption predict for markers of muscle mass and nutrition status in older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012; 16(9):784-90. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-012-0064-6. View

3.
Nuttall F, Gannon M . The metabolic response to a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2006; 55(2):243-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.08.027. View

4.
Appel L . The effects of protein intake on blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2003; 14(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1097/00041433-200302000-00010. View

5.
Stuart C, Shangraw R, Peters E, Wolfe R . Effect of dietary protein on bed-rest-related changes in whole-body-protein synthesis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 52(3):509-14. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/52.3.509. View