» Articles » PMID: 27774282

Effect of Mismatch Repair on the Mutation Rate of Bacteriophage ϕX174

Overview
Journal Virus Evol
Date 2016 Oct 25
PMID 27774282
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Viral mutation rates vary widely in nature, yet the mechanistic and evolutionary determinants of this variability remain unclear. Small DNA viruses mutate orders of magnitude faster than their hosts despite using host-encoded polymerases for replication, which suggests these viruses may avoid post-replicative repair. Supporting this, the genome of bacteriophage ϕX174 is completely devoid of GATC sequence motifs, which are required for methyl-directed mismatch repair in . Here, we show that restoration of the randomly expected number of GATC sites leads to an eightfold reduction in the rate of spontaneous mutation of the phage, without severely impairing its replicative capacity over the short term. However, the efficacy of mismatch repair in the presence of GATC sites is limited by inefficient methylation of the viral DNA. Therefore, both GATC avoidance and DNA under-methylation elevate the mutation rate of the phage relative to that of the host. We also found that the effects of GATC sites on the phage mutation rate vary extensively depending on their specific location within the phage genome. Finally, the mutation rate reduction afforded by GATC sites is fully reverted under stress conditions, which up-regulate repair pathways and expression of error-prone host polymerases such as heat and treatment with the base analog 5-fluorouracil, suggesting that access to repair renders the phage sensitive to stress-induced mutagenesis.

Citing Articles

CRISPR-Cas effector specificity and cleavage site determine phage escape outcomes.

Schelling M, Nguyen G, Sashital D PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(4):e3002065.

PMID: 37058530 PMC: 10132644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002065.


High Fidelity Deep Sequencing Reveals No Effect of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK Cellular DNA Damage Response Pathways on Adenovirus Mutation Rate.

Risso-Ballester J, Sanjuan R Viruses. 2019; 11(10).

PMID: 31614688 PMC: 6832117. DOI: 10.3390/v11100938.

References
1.
Malkova A, Haber J . Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks. Annu Rev Genet. 2012; 46:455-73. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155547. View

2.
Menendez-Arias L . Mutation rates and intrinsic fidelity of retroviral reverse transcriptases. Viruses. 2011; 1(3):1137-65. PMC: 3185545. DOI: 10.3390/v1031137. View

3.
Domingo-Calap P, Cuevas J, Sanjuan R . The fitness effects of random mutations in single-stranded DNA and RNA bacteriophages. PLoS Genet. 2009; 5(11):e1000742. PMC: 2776273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000742. View

4.
Lynch M . Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 2010; 26(8):345-52. PMC: 2910838. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003. View

5.
Fersht A . Fidelity of replication of phage phi X174 DNA by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: spontaneous mutation by misincorporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979; 76(10):4946-50. PMC: 413055. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4946. View