» Articles » PMID: 26747048

Genomic Selection in a Commercial Winter Wheat Population

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Jan 10
PMID 26747048
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic selection models can be trained using historical data and filtering genotypes based on phenotyping intensity and reliability criterion are able to increase the prediction ability. We implemented genomic selection based on a large commercial population incorporating 2325 European winter wheat lines. Our objectives were (1) to study whether modeling epistasis besides additive genetic effects results in enhancement on prediction ability of genomic selection, (2) to assess prediction ability when training population comprised historical or less-intensively phenotyped lines, and (3) to explore the prediction ability in subpopulations selected based on the reliability criterion. We found a 5 % increase in prediction ability when shifting from additive to additive plus epistatic effects models. In addition, only a marginal loss from 0.65 to 0.50 in accuracy was observed using the data collected from 1 year to predict genotypes of the following year, revealing that stable genomic selection models can be accurately calibrated to predict subsequent breeding stages. Moreover, prediction ability was maximized when the genotypes evaluated in a single location were excluded from the training set but subsequently decreased again when the phenotyping intensity was increased above two locations, suggesting that the update of the training population should be performed considering all the selected genotypes but excluding those evaluated in a single location. The genomic prediction ability was substantially higher in subpopulations selected based on the reliability criterion, indicating that phenotypic selection for highly reliable individuals could be directly replaced by applying genomic selection to them. We empirically conclude that there is a high potential to assist commercial wheat breeding programs employing genomic selection approaches.

Citing Articles

Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.

Mothukuri S, Beyene Y, Gultas M, Burgueno J, Griebel S Theor Appl Genet. 2025; 138(3):62.

PMID: 40016556 PMC: 11868319. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-025-04825-y.


Genomic selection and genetic architecture of agronomic traits during modern flowering Chinese cabbage breeding.

Zhao Y, Li G, Zhu Z, Hu M, Jiang D, Chen M Hortic Res. 2025; 12(2):uhae299.

PMID: 39949876 PMC: 11822411. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae299.


Performance of phenomic selection in rice: Effects of population size and genotype-environment interactions on predictive ability.

de Verdal H, Segura V, Pot D, Salas N, Garin V, Rakotoson T PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0309502.

PMID: 39715250 PMC: 11666020. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309502.


Source-sink synergy is the key unlocking sweet potato starch yield potential.

Jiang Z, Wei Z, Zhang J, Zheng C, Zhu H, Zhai H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7260.

PMID: 39179563 PMC: 11343742. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51727-6.


Prediction of additive, epistatic, and dominance effects using models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines of hybrid rye and sugar beet.

Kristensen P, Sarup P, Fe D, Orabi J, Snell P, Ripa L Front Plant Sci. 2024; 14:1193433.

PMID: 38162304 PMC: 10756082. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1193433.


References
1.
Schulz-Streeck T, Ogutu J, Piepho H . Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 126(1):69-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1960-1. View

2.
de Los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa G, Weigel K, Crossa J . Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res (Camb). 2010; 92(4):295-308. DOI: 10.1017/S0016672310000285. View

3.
Crossa J, de Los Campos G, Perez P, Gianola D, Burgueno J, Araus J . Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics. 2010; 186(2):713-24. PMC: 2954475. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.118521. View

4.
Isidro J, Jannink J, Akdemir D, Poland J, Heslot N, Sorrells M . Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet. 2014; 128(1):145-58. PMC: 4282691. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-014-2418-4. View

5.
Zhong S, Dekkers J, Fernando R, Jannink J . Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study. Genetics. 2009; 182(1):355-64. PMC: 2674832. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.098277. View