» Articles » PMID: 18073436

The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-assisted Breeding Values

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2007 Dec 13
PMID 18073436
Citations 526
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The success of genomic selection depends on the potential to predict genome-assisted breeding values (GEBVs) with high accuracy over several generations without additional phenotyping after estimating marker effects. Results from both simulations and practical applications have to be evaluated for this potential, which requires linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and QTL. This study shows that markers can capture genetic relationships among genotyped animals, thereby affecting accuracies of GEBVs. Strategies to validate the accuracy of GEBVs due to LD are given. Simulations were used to show that accuracies of GEBVs obtained by fixed regression-least squares (FR-LS), random regression-best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP), and Bayes-B are nonzero even without LD. When LD was present, accuracies decrease rapidly in generations after estimation due to the decay of genetic relationships. However, there is a persistent accuracy due to LD, which can be estimated by modeling the decay of genetic relationships and the decay of LD. The impact of genetic relationships was greatest for RR-BLUP. The accuracy of GEBVs can result entirely from genetic relationships captured by markers, and to validate the potential of genomic selection, several generations have to be analyzed to estimate the accuracy due to LD. The method of choice was Bayes-B; FR-LS should be investigated further, whereas RR-BLUP cannot be recommended.

Citing Articles

A comparison of design algorithms for choosing the training population in genomic models.

Stadler A, Muller W, Futschik A Front Genet. 2025; 15:1462855.

PMID: 40018340 PMC: 11865072. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1462855.


Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.

Mothukuri S, Beyene Y, Gultas M, Burgueno J, Griebel S Theor Appl Genet. 2025; 138(3):62.

PMID: 40016556 PMC: 11868319. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-025-04825-y.


Integrating phenomic selection using single-kernel near-infrared spectroscopy and genomic selection for corn breeding improvement.

Graciano R, Peixoto M, Leach K, Suzuki N, Gustin J, Settles A Theor Appl Genet. 2025; 138(3):60.

PMID: 40009111 PMC: 11865162. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-025-04843-w.


Fine-tuning GBS data with comparison of reference and mock genome approaches for advancing genomic selection in less studied farmed species.

Fischer D, Tapio M, Bitz O, Iso-Touru T, Kause A, Tapio I BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):111.

PMID: 39910437 PMC: 11796084. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11296-4.


Optimizing fully-efficient two-stage models for genomic selection using open-source software.

Fernandez-Gonzalez J, Isidro Y Sanchez J Plant Methods. 2025; 21(1):9.

PMID: 39905443 PMC: 11796230. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-024-01318-9.


References
1.
Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M . Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001; 157(4):1819-29. PMC: 1461589. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819. View

2.
Sved J . Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1971; 2(2):125-41. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(71)90011-6. View

3.
Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson J . Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J Anim Sci. 1997; 75(7):1738-45. DOI: 10.2527/1997.7571738x. View