» Articles » PMID: 21586131

Impacts of Both Reference Population Size and Inclusion of a Residual Polygenic Effect on the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction

Overview
Journal Genet Sel Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2011 May 19
PMID 21586131
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this work was to study the impact of both the size of genomic reference populations and the inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on dairy cattle genetic evaluations enhanced with genomic information.

Methods: Direct genomic values were estimated for German Holstein cattle with a genomic BLUP model including a residual polygenic effect. A total of 17,429 genotyped Holstein bulls were evaluated using the phenotypes of 44 traits. The Interbull genomic validation test was implemented to investigate how the inclusion of a residual polygenic effect impacted genomic estimated breeding values.

Results: As the number of reference bulls increased, both the variance of the estimates of single nucleotide polymorphism effects and the reliability of the direct genomic values of selection candidates increased. Fitting a residual polygenic effect in the model resulted in less biased genome-enhanced breeding values and decreased the correlation between direct genomic values and estimated breeding values of sires in the reference population.

Conclusions: Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle enhanced with genomic information is highly effective in increasing reliability, as well as using large genomic reference populations. We found that fitting a residual polygenic effect reduced the bias in genome-enhanced breeding values, decreased the correlation between direct genomic values and sire's estimated breeding values and made genome-enhanced breeding values more consistent in mean and variance as is the case for pedigree-based estimated breeding values.

Citing Articles

Scald resistance in hybrid rye (): genomic prediction and GWAS.

Madsen M, Kristensen P, Mahmood K, Thach T, Mohlfeld M, Orabi J Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1306591.

PMID: 38304738 PMC: 10830712. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1306591.


Genome-Wide Association Studies of Live Weight at First Breeding at Eight Months of Age and Pregnancy Status of Ewe Lambs.

Haslin E, Pettigrew E, Hickson R, Kenyon P, Gedye K, Lopez-Villalobos N Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(4).

PMID: 37107563 PMC: 10137859. DOI: 10.3390/genes14040805.


Genomic evaluation of carcass traits of Korean beef cattle Hanwoo using a single-step marker effect model.

Koo Y, Alkhoder H, Choi T, Liu Z, Reents R J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37004242 PMC: 10118395. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad104.


Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Important Economic Traits of Cashmere and Meat Goats Assessed by Simulation Study.

Yan X, Zhang T, Liu L, Yu Y, Yang G, Han Y Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:770539.

PMID: 35372544 PMC: 8966406. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.770539.


Analysis of Longevity Traits in Holstein Cattle: A Review.

Hu H, Mu T, Ma Y, Wang X, Ma Y Front Genet. 2021; 12:695543.

PMID: 34413878 PMC: 8369829. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.695543.


References
1.
Daetwyler H, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams J . The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics. 2010; 185(3):1021-31. PMC: 2907189. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.116855. View

2.
Legarra A, Misztal I . Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 91(1):360-6. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0403. View

3.
Solberg T, Sonesson A, Woolliams J, Odegard J, Meuwissen T . Persistence of accuracy of genome-wide breeding values over generations when including a polygenic effect. Genet Sel Evol. 2009; 41:53. PMC: 2813225. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-53. View

4.
Habier D, Fernando R, Dekkers J . The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007; 177(4):2389-97. PMC: 2219482. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.081190. View

5.
Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor T . Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(2):743-52. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2730. View