» Articles » PMID: 38162304

Prediction of Additive, Epistatic, and Dominance Effects Using Models Accounting for Incomplete Inbreeding in Parental Lines of Hybrid Rye and Sugar Beet

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2024 Jan 1
PMID 38162304
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic models for prediction of additive and non-additive effects within and across different heterotic groups are lacking for breeding of hybrid crops. In this study, genomic prediction models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines from two different heterotic groups were developed and evaluated. The models can be used for prediction of general combining ability (GCA) of parental lines from each heterotic group as well as specific combining ability (SCA) of all realized and potential crosses. Here, GCA was estimated as the sum of additive genetic effects and within-group epistasis due to high degree of inbreeding in parental lines. SCA was estimated as the sum of across-group epistasis and dominance effects. Three models were compared. In model 1, it was assumed that each hybrid was produced from two completely inbred parental lines. Model 1 was extended to include three-way hybrids from parental lines with arbitrary levels of inbreeding: In model 2, parents of the three-way hybrids could have any levels of inbreeding, while the grandparents of the maternal parent were assumed completely inbred. In model 3, all parental components could have any levels of inbreeding. Data from commercial breeding programs for hybrid rye and sugar beet was used to evaluate the models. The traits grain yield and root yield were analyzed for rye and sugar beet, respectively. Additive genetic variances were larger than epistatic and dominance variances. The models' predictive abilities for total genetic value, for GCA of each parental line and for SCA were evaluated based on different cross-validation strategies. Predictive abilities were highest for total genetic values and lowest for SCA. Predictive abilities for SCA and for GCA of maternal lines were higher for model 2 and model 3 than for model 1. The implementation of the genomic prediction models in hybrid breeding programs can potentially lead to increased genetic gain in two different ways: I) by facilitating the selection of crossing parents with high GCA within heterotic groups and II) by prediction of SCA of all realized and potential combinations of parental lines to produce hybrids with high total genetic values.

Citing Articles

Simulation of functional additive and non-additive genetic effects using statistical estimates from quantitative genetic models.

Chu T, Kristensen P, Jensen J Heredity (Edinb). 2024; 133(1):33-42.

PMID: 38822133 PMC: 11222558. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-024-00690-5.


Genomic Prediction from Multi-Environment Trials of Wheat Breeding.

Garcia-Barrios G, Crespo-Herrera L, Cruz-Izquierdo S, Vitale P, Sandoval-Islas J, Gerard G Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38674352 PMC: 11049976. DOI: 10.3390/genes15040417.


Scald resistance in hybrid rye (): genomic prediction and GWAS.

Madsen M, Kristensen P, Mahmood K, Thach T, Mohlfeld M, Orabi J Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1306591.

PMID: 38304738 PMC: 10830712. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1306591.

References
1.
Wurschum T, Reif J, Kraft T, Janssen G, Zhao Y . Genomic selection in sugar beet breeding populations. BMC Genet. 2013; 14:85. PMC: 3848454. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-85. View

2.
Reif J, Gumpert F, Fischer S, Melchinger A . Impact of interpopulation divergence on additive and dominance variance in hybrid populations. Genetics. 2007; 176(3):1931-4. PMC: 1931541. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.074146. View

3.
Moritani M, Taguchi K, Kitazaki K, Matsuhira H, Katsuyama T, Mikami T . Identification of the predominant nonrestoring allele for Owen-type cytoplasmic male sterility in sugar beet ( L.): development of molecular markers for the maintainer genotype. Mol Breed. 2013; 32(1):91-100. PMC: 3684711. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-013-9854-8. View

4.
Auinger H, Schonleben M, Lehermeier C, Schmidt M, Korzun V, Geiger H . Model training across multiple breeding cycles significantly improves genomic prediction accuracy in rye (Secale cereale L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129(11):2043-2053. PMC: 5069347. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2756-5. View

5.
Huang W, Mackay T . The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits Cannot Be Inferred from Variance Component Analysis. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12(11):e1006421. PMC: 5094750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006421. View