» Articles » PMID: 26437225

Chemogenetic Profiling Identifies RAD17 As Synthetically Lethal with Checkpoint Kinase Inhibition

Abstract

Chemical inhibitors of the checkpoint kinases have shown promise in the treatment of cancer, yet their clinical utility may be limited by a lack of molecular biomarkers to identify specific patients most likely to respond to therapy. To this end, we screened 112 known tumor suppressor genes for synthetic lethal interactions with inhibitors of the CHEK1 and CHEK2 checkpoint kinases. We identified eight interactions, including the Replication Factor C (RFC)-related protein RAD17. Clonogenic assays in RAD17 knockdown cell lines identified a substantial shift in sensitivity to checkpoint kinase inhibition (3.5-fold) as compared to RAD17 wild-type. Additional evidence for this interaction was found in a large-scale functional shRNA screen of over 100 genotyped cancer cell lines, in which CHEK1/2 mutant cell lines were unexpectedly sensitive to RAD17 knockdown. This interaction was widely conserved, as we found that RAD17 interacts strongly with checkpoint kinases in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the setting of RAD17 knockdown, CHEK1/2 inhibition was found to be synergistic with inhibition of WEE1, another pharmacologically relevant checkpoint kinase. Accumulation of the DNA damage marker γH2AX following chemical inhibition or transient knockdown of CHEK1, CHEK2 or WEE1 was magnified by knockdown of RAD17. Taken together, our data suggest that CHEK1 or WEE1 inhibitors are likely to have greater clinical efficacy in tumors with RAD17 loss-of-function.

Citing Articles

Identification of RAD17 as a candidate cancer predisposition gene in families with histories of pancreatic and breast cancers.

Joris S, Giron P, Olsen C, Seneca S, Gheldof A, Staessens S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):723.

PMID: 38872153 PMC: 11170902. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12442-z.


A multi-scale map of protein assemblies in the DNA damage response.

Kratz A, Kim M, Kelly M, Zheng F, Koczor C, Li J Cell Syst. 2023; 14(6):447-463.e8.

PMID: 37220749 PMC: 10330685. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.04.007.


Synthetic lethal gene pairs: Experimental approaches and predictive models.

Tang S, Gokbag B, Fan K, Shao S, Huo Y, Wu X Front Genet. 2022; 13:961611.

PMID: 36531238 PMC: 9751344. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.961611.


Impairment of RAD17 Functions by miR-506-3p as a Novel Synthetic Lethal Approach Targeting DNA Repair Pathways in Ovarian Cancer.

Bagnoli M, Nicoletti R, Valitutti M, Rizzo A, Napoli A, Montalvao De Azevedo R Front Oncol. 2022; 12:923508.

PMID: 35924161 PMC: 9340372. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.923508.


Basal CHK1 activity safeguards its stability to maintain intrinsic S-phase checkpoint functions.

Michelena J, Gatti M, Teloni F, Imhof R, Altmeyer M J Cell Biol. 2019; 218(9):2865-2875.

PMID: 31366665 PMC: 6719454. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201902085.


References
1.
Mak J, Man W, Chow J, Ma H, Poon R . Pharmacological inactivation of CHK1 and WEE1 induces mitotic catastrophe in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2015; 6(25):21074-84. PMC: 4673251. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4020. View

2.
Pitts T, Davis S, Eckhardt S, Bradshaw-Pierce E . Targeting nuclear kinases in cancer: development of cell cycle kinase inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 142(2):258-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.12.010. View

3.
Chila R, Basana A, Lupi M, Guffanti F, Gaudio E, Rinaldi A . Combined inhibition of Chk1 and Wee1 as a new therapeutic strategy for mantle cell lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2014; 6(5):3394-408. PMC: 4413661. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2583. View

4.
Al-Ahmadie H, Iyer G, Hohl M, Asthana S, Inagaki A, Schultz N . Synthetic lethality in ATM-deficient RAD50-mutant tumors underlies outlier response to cancer therapy. Cancer Discov. 2014; 4(9):1014-21. PMC: 4155059. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0380. View

5.
Do K, Wilsker D, Ji J, Zlott J, Freshwater T, Kinders R . Phase I Study of Single-Agent AZD1775 (MK-1775), a Wee1 Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(30):3409-15. PMC: 4606059. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.4009. View