» Articles » PMID: 39355220

Advances and Challenges in ImmunoPET Methodology

Overview
Journal Front Nucl Med
Date 2024 Oct 2
PMID 39355220
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) enables imaging of specific targets that play a role in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, such as antigens on cell membranes, targets in the disease microenvironment, or immune cells. The most common immunoPET applications use a monoclonal antibody labeled with a relatively long-lived positron emitter such as Zr (  = 78.4 h), but smaller antibody-based constructs labeled with various other positron emitting radionuclides are also being investigated. This molecular imaging technique can thus guide the development of new drugs and may have a pivotal role in selecting patients for a particular therapy. In early phase immunoPET trials, multiple imaging time points are used to examine the time-dependent biodistribution and to determine the optimal imaging time point, which may be several days after tracer injection due to the slow kinetics of larger molecules. Once this has been established, usually only one static scan is performed and semi-quantitative values are reported. However, total PET uptake of a tracer is the sum of specific and nonspecific uptake. In addition, uptake may be affected by other factors such as perfusion, pre-/co-administration of the unlabeled molecule, and the treatment schedule. This article reviews imaging methodologies used in immunoPET studies and is divided into two parts. The first part summarizes the vast majority of clinical immunoPET studies applying semi-quantitative methodologies. The second part focuses on a handful of studies applying pharmacokinetic models and includes preclinical and simulation studies. Finally, the potential and challenges of immunoPET quantification methodologies are discussed within the context of the recent technological advancements provided by long axial field of view PET/CT scanners.

Citing Articles

Good practices for Zr radiopharmaceutical production and quality control.

Wuensche T, Lyashchenko S, van Dongen G, Vugts D EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2024; 9(1):40.

PMID: 38733556 PMC: 11088613. DOI: 10.1186/s41181-024-00258-y.

References
1.
Heuveling D, de Bree R, Vugts D, Huisman M, Giovannoni L, Hoekstra O . Phase 0 microdosing PET study using the human mini antibody F16SIP in head and neck cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2013; 54(3):397-401. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.111310. View

2.
Sandstrom M, Lindskog K, Velikyan I, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Sandberg D . Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of the Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecule 68Ga-ABY-025 in Breast Cancer Patients. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(6):867-71. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169342. View

3.
van Brummelen E, Huisman M, de Wit-van der Veen L, Nayak T, Stokkel M, Mulder E . Zr-labeled CEA-targeted IL-2 variant immunocytokine in patients with solid tumors: CEA-mediated tumor accumulation and role of IL-2 receptor-binding. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(37):24737-24749. PMC: 5973872. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25343. View

4.
Beckford-Vera D, Flavell R, Seo Y, Martinez-Ortiz E, Aslam M, Thanh C . First-in-human immunoPET imaging of HIV-1 infection using Zr-labeled VRC01 broadly neutralizing antibody. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1219. PMC: 8907355. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28727-5. View

5.
Laforest R, Dehdashti F, Liu Y, Frye J, Frye S, Luehmann H . First-in-Man Evaluation of I-PGN650: A PET Tracer for Detecting Phosphatidylserine as a Biomarker of the Solid Tumor Microenvironment. Mol Imaging. 2017; 16:1536012117733349. PMC: 5648081. DOI: 10.1177/1536012117733349. View