» Articles » PMID: 25885270

Determination of the Optimal Matching Position for Setup Images and Minimal Setup Margins in Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Breast and Lymph Nodes Treated in Voluntary Deep Inhalation Breath-hold

Overview
Journal Radiat Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2015 Apr 18
PMID 25885270
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer is increasingly performed in voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (vDIBH). The aim of this study was to estimate the reproducibility of breath-hold level (BHL) and to find optimal bony landmarks for matching of orthogonal setup images to minimise setup margins.

Methods: 1067 sets of images with an orthogonal setup and tangential field from 67 patients were retrospectively analysed. Residual position errors were determined in the tangential treatment field images for different matches of the setup images. Variation of patient posture and BHL were analysed for position errors of the vertebrae, clavicula, ribs and sternum in the setup and tangential field images. The BHL was controlled with a Varian RPM® system. Setup margins were calculated using the van Herk's formula. Patients who underwent lymph node irradiation were also investigated.

Results: For the breast alone, the midway compromise of the ribs and sternum was the best general choice for matching of the setup images. The required margins were 6.5 mm and 5.3 mm in superior-inferior (SI) and lateral/anterior-posterior (LAT/AP) directions, respectively. With the individually optimised image matching position also including the vertebrae, slightly smaller margins of 6.0 mm and 4.8 mm were achieved, respectively. With the individually optimised match, margins of 7.5 mm and 10.8 mm should be used in LAT and SI directions, respectively, for the lymph node regions. These margins were considered too large. The reproducibility of the BHL was within 5 mm in the AP direction for 75% of patients.

Conclusions: The smallest setup margins were obtained when the matching position of the setup images was individually optimised for each patient. Optimal match for the breast alone is not optimal for the lymph node region, and, therefore, a threshold of 5 mm was introduced for residual position errors of the sternum, upper vertebrae, clavicula and chest wall to retain minimal setup margins of 5 mm. Because random interfraction variation in patient posture was large, we recommend daily online image guidance. The BHL should be verified with image guidance.

Citing Articles

Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer - a multicenter study on the setup accuracy.

Laaksomaa M, Aula A, Sarudis S, Keyrilainen J, Ahlroth J, Murtola A Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024; 29(2):176-186.

PMID: 39143974 PMC: 11321775. DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99673.


Adaptive radiotherapy for breast cancer.

De-Colle C, Kirby A, Russell N, Shaitelman S, Currey A, Donovan E Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023; 39:100564.

PMID: 36632056 PMC: 9826896. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100564.


The use of Hybrid Techniques in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Karaca S Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 21:15330338221143937.

PMID: 36537067 PMC: 9772967. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221143937.


AlignRT, Catalyst™ and RPM™ in locoregional radiotherapy of breast cancer with DIBH. Is IGRT still needed?.

Laaksomaa M, Ahlroth J, Pynnonen K, Murtola A, Rossi M Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(5):797-808.

PMID: 36523797 PMC: 9746643. DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0097.


Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients.

Mannerberg A, Kugele M, Hamid S, Edvardsson A, Petersson K, Gunnlaugsson A Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2021; 19:41-45.

PMID: 34527818 PMC: 8430426. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001.


References
1.
Bortfeld T, Van Herk M, Jiang S . When should systematic patient positioning errors in radiotherapy be corrected?. Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47(23):N297-302. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/23/401. View

2.
Stranzl H, Zurl B, Langsenlehner T, Kapp K . Wide tangential fields including the internal mammary lymph nodes in patients with left-sided breast cancer. Influence of respiratory-controlled radiotherapy (4D-CT) on cardiac exposure. Strahlenther Onkol. 2009; 185(3):155-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-1939-2. View

3.
Topolnjak R, Sonke J, Nijkamp J, Rasch C, Minkema D, Remeijer P . Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78(4):1235-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.021. View

4.
Chopra S, Dinshaw K, Kamble R, Sarin R . Breast movement during normal and deep breathing, respiratory training and set up errors: implications for external beam partial breast irradiation. Br J Radiol. 2006; 79(945):766-73. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/98024704. View

5.
Gierga D, Turcotte J, Sharp G, Sedlacek D, Cotter C, Taghian A . A voluntary breath-hold treatment technique for the left breast with unfavorable cardiac anatomy using surface imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(5):e663-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2379. View