Dosimetric Effects of Anatomical Deformations and Positioning Errors in VMAT Breast Radiotherapy
Overview
General Medicine
Affiliations
Aim: Traditional radiotherapy treatment techniques of the breast are insensitive for deformations and swelling of the soft tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose changes seen with tissue deformations using different image matching methods when VMAT technique was used, and compare these with tangential technique.
Methods: The study included 24 patients with breast or chest wall irradiations, nine of whom were bilateral. In addition to planar kV setup imaging, patients underwent weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to evaluate soft tissue deformations. The effect of the deformations was evaluated on VMAT plans optimized with 5-mm virtual bolus to create skin flash, and compared to standard tangential plans with 2.5 cm skin flash. Isocenter positioning using 2D imaging and CBCT were compared.
Results: With postural changes and soft tissue deformations, the target coverage decreased more in the VMAT plans than in the tangential plans. The planned V90% coverage was 98.3% and 99.0% in the tangential and VMAT plans, respectively. When tattoo-based setup and online 2D match were used, the coverage decreased to 97.9% in tangential and 96.5% in VMAT plans (P < 0.001). With automatic CBCT-based image match the respective coverages were 98.3% and 98.8%. In the cases of large soft tissue deformations, the replanning was needed for the VMAT plan, whereas the tangential plan still covered the whole target volume.
Conclusions: The skin flash created using an optimization bolus for VMAT plans was in most cases enough to take into account the soft tissue deformations seen in breast VMAT treatments. However, in some cases larger skin flash or replanning were needed. The use of 2D match decreased the target coverage for VMAT plans but not for FinF plans when compared to 3D match. The use of CBCT match is recommended when treating breast/chest wall patients with VMAT technique.
Mankinen M, Viren T, Seppala J, Koivumaki T Radiat Oncol. 2024; 19(1):21.
PMID: 38347554 PMC: 10863193. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02418-5.
Organ-contour-driven auto-matching algorithm in image-guided radiotherapy.
Kishigami Y, Nakamura M, Okamoto H, Takahashi A, Iramina H, Sasaki M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 25(1):e14220.
PMID: 37994694 PMC: 10795436. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14220.
Sarkar B, Pradhan A J Med Phys. 2023; 48(3):221-229.
PMID: 37969141 PMC: 10642598. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_51_23.
Yoo S, Blitzblau R, McDuff S, Yin F, Cui Y J Radiosurg SBRT. 2023; 8(3):227-235.
PMID: 36861003 PMC: 9970744.
Prunaretty J, Mir N, Tilhac A, Gouillou M, Azria D, Fenoglietto P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).
PMID: 36769509 PMC: 9917561. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030862.