A Comparison of Two Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Caudal Injection: The Influence of the Depth of the Inserted Needle on Caudal Block

Overview

Journal Korean J Pain

Date 2015 Apr 9

PMID 25852834

Citations 13

Authors

A Ram Doo

Jin Wan Kim

Ji Hye Lee

Young Jin Han

Ji Seon Son

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Caudal epidural injections have been commonly performed in patients with low back pain and radiculopathy. Although caudal injection has generally been accepted as a safe procedure, serious complications such as inadvertent intravascular injection and dural puncture can occur. The present prospective study was designed to investigate the influence of the depth of the inserted needle on the success rate of caudal epidural blocks.

Methods: A total of 49 adults scheduled to receive caudal epidural injections were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group 1 to receive the caudal injection through a conventional method, i.e., caudal injection after advancement of the needle 1 cm into the sacral canal (n = 25), and Group 2 to receive the injection through a new method, i.e., injection right after penetrating the sacrococcygeal ligament (n = 24). Ultrasound was used to identify the sacral hiatus and to achieve accurate needle placement according to the allocated groups. Contrast dyed fluoroscopy was obtained to evaluate the epidural spread of injected materials and to monitor the possible complications.

Results: The success rates of the caudal injections were 68.0% in Group 1 and 95.8% in Group 2 (P = 0.023). The incidences of intravascular injections were 24.0% in Group 1 and 0% in Group 2 (P = 0.022). No intrathecal injection was found in either of the two groups.

Conclusions: The new caudal epidural injection technique tested in this study is a reliable alternative, with a higher success rate and lower risk of accidental intravascular injection than the conventional technique.

Citing Articles

Comparison of international medical costs for interventional pain treatment: a focus on Korea and Japan.

Lee E, Won H, Yang M, Kim H, Kim Y Korean J Pain. 2023; 37(1):51-58.

PMID: 38072796 PMC: 10764213. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.23254.

A randomized double-blinded controlled trial comparing ultrasound-guided versus conventional injection for caudal block in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries.

Kollipara N, Kodali V, Parameswari A J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 37(2):249-254.

PMID: 34349375 PMC: 8289659. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_361_19.

Prediction of successful caudal epidural injection using color Doppler ultrasonography in the paramedian sagittal oblique view of the lumbosacral spine.

Yoo S, Ki M, Doo A, Woo C, Kim Y, Son J Korean J Pain. 2021; 34(3):339-345.

PMID: 34193640 PMC: 8255148. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.339.

The Influence of Ultrasound-Guided Technique Using a Catheter-Over-Needle on the Incidence of Accidental Intravascular Injection during Caudal Block-A Retrospective Case Series Study.

Oh D Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(4).

PMID: 33808168 PMC: 8066850. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57040318.

Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Anesthesia in Adults for Anorectal Procedures.

Vadhanan P, Rajendran I, Rajasekar P Anesth Essays Res. 2021; 14(2):239-242.

PMID: 33487822 PMC: 7819400. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_60_20.

References

Manchikanti L, Cash K, Pampati V, McManus C, Damron K . Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2006; 7(1):81-92. View

Yue W, Tan S . Distant skip level discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis after caudal epidural injection: a case report of a rare complication of epidural injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(11):E209-11. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067280.29261.57. View

Manchikanti L, Cash K, McManus C, Pampati V, Fellows B . Results of 2-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in central spinal stenosis. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(5):371-84. View

Yoon J, Sim K, Kim S, Kim W, Koh S, Kim B . The feasibility of color Doppler ultrasonography for caudal epidural steroid injection. Pain. 2005; 118(1-2):210-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.014. View

Tsui B, Tarkkila P, Gupta S, Kearney R . Confirmation of caudal needle placement using nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91(2):374-8. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199908000-00010. View

McGrath J, Schaefer M, Malkamaki D . Incidence and characteristics of complications from epidural steroid injections. Pain Med. 2011; 12(5):726-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01077.x. View

Chen C, Tang S, Hsu T, Tsai W, Liu H, Chen M . Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101(1):181-4. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00028. View

Ergin A, Yanarates O, Sizlan A, Orhan M, Kurt E, Guzeldemir M . Accuracy of caudal epidural injection: the importance of real-time imaging. Pain Pract. 2006; 5(3):251-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2005.05311.x. View

Manchikanti L, Malla Y, Wargo B, Cash K, Pampati V, Fellows B . A prospective evaluation of complications of 10,000 fluoroscopically directed epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(2):131-40. View

10.

Parr A, Manchikanti L, Hameed H, Conn A, Manchikanti K, Benyamin R . Caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain: a systematic appraisal of the literature. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(3):E159-98. View

11.

Fukazawa K, Matsuki Y, Ueno H, Hosokawa T, Hirose M . Risk factors related to accidental intravascular injection during caudal anesthesia. J Anesth. 2014; 28(6):940-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1840-8. View

12.

Joo J, Kim J, Lee J . The prevalence of anatomical variations that can cause inadvertent dural puncture when performing caudal block in Koreans: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesthesia. 2009; 65(1):23-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06168.x. View

13.

Aggarwal A, Kaur H, Batra Y, Aggarwal A, Rajeev S, Sahni D . Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: a cadaver study. Clin Anat. 2009; 22(6):730-7. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20832. View

14.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash K, Pampati V, Damron K, Boswell M . Effect of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid or local anesthetic injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and radiculitis: a randomized, controlled, double blind trial with a two-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(4):273-86. View

15.

Sullivan W, Willick S, Zuhosky J, Tyburski M, DREYFUSS P, PRATHER H . Incidence of intravascular uptake in lumbar spinal injection procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(4):481-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00015. View

16.

Manchikanti L, Cash K, McManus C, Pampati V . Fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic axial low back pain without disc herniation, radiculitis, or facet joint pain. J Pain Res. 2012; 5:381-90. PMC: 3474158. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S35924. View

17.

Lewis M, Thomas P, Wilson L, Mulholland R . The 'whoosh' test. A clinical test to confirm correct needle placement in caudal epidural injections. Anaesthesia. 1992; 47(1):57-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb01957.x. View

18.

Botwin K, Brown L, Fishman M, Rao S . Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis. Pain Physician. 2007; 10(4):547-58. View

19.

Ogoke B . Caudal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2006; 3(3):305-12. View

20.

Aggarwal A, Aggarwal A, Harjeet , Sahni D . Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(10):793-800. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0529-4. View