Incidence of Intravascular Uptake in Lumbar Spinal Injection Procedures
Overview
Affiliations
Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, observational study.
Objectives: To document the incidence of and factors associated with intravascular uptake during lumbar spinal injection procedures.
Summary Of Background Data: In prior reports, the incidence of inadvertent intravascular needle placement during contrast-enhanced, fluoroscopically guided lumbar spinal injection procedures has been incidentally noted to range from 6.4% to 9.2%. We present the first systematic prospective documentation of intravascular uptake of contrast dye during different types of lumbar injection procedures.
Methods: Fifteen interventional spine physicians in seven centers recorded data regarding intravascular uptake during 1219 contrast-enhanced, fluoroscopically guided lumbar spinal injection procedures.
Results: The overall incidence of intravascular uptake during lumbar spinal injection procedures as determined by contrast enhanced fluoroscopic observation is 8.5%. Caudal and transforaminal routes have the highest rates at 10.9% and 10.8%, respectively, followed by zygapophyseal joint (6.1%), sacroiliac joint (5.3%), and translaminar (1.9%) injections. Intravascular uptake is twice as likely to occur in those patients over rather than under 50 years of age. Preinjection aspiration failed to produce a flashback of blood in 74% of cases that proved to be intravascular upon injection of contrast dye.
Conclusion: The incidence of intravascular uptake during lumbar spinal injection procedures is approximately 8.5%. The route of injection and the age of the patient greatly affect this rate. Absence of flashback of blood upon preinjection aspiration does not predict extravascular needle placement. Contrast-enhanced, fluoroscopic guidance is recommended when doing lumbar spinal injection procedures to prevent inadvertent intravascular uptake of injectate.
Yang K, Mistry P, Spalding W Ultrasound. 2024; :1742271X241275242.
PMID: 39555153 PMC: 11563494. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X241275242.
Madhavan A, Liebo G, Baffour F, Diehn F, Maus T, Murthy N Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199231221857.
PMID: 38179603 PMC: 11571312. DOI: 10.1177/15910199231221857.
Ultrasound-guided procedures for the management of chronic thoracic back pain: a technical review.
Ferreira-Silva N, Ribas R, Hurdle M, Gupta S, Clendenen S, Ferreira-Dos-Santos G J Ultrasound. 2023; 27(1):1-11.
PMID: 37648900 PMC: 10908924. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-023-00825-0.
The Role of Power Doppler Ultrasonography in Caudal Epidural Injection.
Tsai Y, Huang G, Tang C, Yang F, Hsu Y Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(5).
PMID: 35629992 PMC: 9144919. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58050575.
Gupta S, Gupta H, Baranidharan G, Sharma M Br J Pain. 2021; 15(2):129-133.
PMID: 34055334 PMC: 8138611. DOI: 10.1177/2049463720960497.