» Articles » PMID: 25549111

Evaluation of Methods to Improve the Extraction and Recovery of DNA from Cotton Swabs for Forensic Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Dec 31
PMID 25549111
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Samples for forensic DNA analysis are often collected from a wide variety of objects using cotton or nylon tipped swabs. Testing has shown that significant quantities of DNA are retained on the swab, however, and subsequently lost. When processing evidentiary samples, the recovery of the maximum amount of available DNA is critical, potentially dictating whether a usable profile can be derived from a piece of evidence or not. The QIAamp DNA Investigator extraction kit was used with its recommended protocol for swabs (one hour incubation at 56°C) as a baseline. Results indicate that over 50% of the recoverable DNA may be retained on the cotton swab tip, or otherwise lost, for both blood and buccal cell samples when using this protocol. The protocol's incubation time and temperature were altered, as was incubating while shaking or stationary to test for increases in recovery efficiency. An additional step was then tested that included periodic re-suspension of the swab tip in the extraction buffer during incubation. Aliquots of liquid blood or a buccal cell suspension were deposited and dried on cotton swabs and compared with swab-less controls. The concentration of DNA in each extract was quantified and STR analysis was performed to assess the quality of the extracted DNA. Stationary incubations and those performed at 65°C did not result in significant gains in DNA yield. Samples incubated for 24 hours yielded less DNA. Increased yields were observed with three and 18 hour incubation periods. Increases in DNA yields were also observed using a swab re-suspension method for both cell types. The swab re-suspension method yielded an average two-fold increase in recovered DNA yield with buccal cells and an average three-fold increase with blood cells. These findings demonstrate that more of the DNA collected on swabs can be recovered with specific protocol alterations.

Citing Articles

Detection and Molecular Diversity of in Pastoral Livestock in North-Eastern Ethiopia.

Sibhat B, Adamu H, Asmare K, Lindahl J, Magnusson U, Tessema T Pathogens. 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39770323 PMC: 11728775. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13121063.


Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces.

Kuffel A, Daeid N, Gray A Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024; 8:100453.

PMID: 38283046 PMC: 10821607. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100453.


The Murine Oral Metatranscriptome Reveals Microbial and Host Signatures of Periodontal Disease.

Joseph S, Carda-Dieguez M, Aduse-Opoku J, Alsam A, Mira A, Curtis M J Dent Res. 2023; 102(5):565-573.

PMID: 36883648 PMC: 10152569. DOI: 10.1177/00220345221149675.


The Perfect Match: Assessment of Sample Collection Efficiency for Immunological and Molecular Findings in Different Types of Fabrics.

Zapico S, Dytso A, Rubio L, Roca G Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(18).

PMID: 36142599 PMC: 9502974. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810686.


Rapid and zero-cost DNA extraction from soft-bodied insects for routine PCR-based applications.

Jangra S, Ghosh A PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271312.

PMID: 35839213 PMC: 9286237. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271312.


References
1.
Hoffmann S, Stallworth S, Foran D . Investigative studies into the recovery of DNA from improvised explosive device containers. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 57(3):602-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01982.x. View

2.
de Bruin K, Verheij S, Veenhoven M, Sijen T . Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim's skin. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011; 6(2):219-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.019. View

3.
Zech W, Malik N, Thali M . Applicability of DNA analysis on adhesive tape in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 57(4):1036-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02105.x. View

4.
Verdon T, Mitchell R, van Oorschot R . The influence of substrate on DNA transfer and extraction efficiency. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012; 7(1):167-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.09.004. View

5.
Thomasma S, Foran D . The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples. J Forensic Sci. 2013; 58(2):465-9. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12036. View