» Articles » PMID: 23278347

The Influence of Swabbing Solutions on DNA Recovery from Touch Samples

Overview
Journal J Forensic Sci
Specialty Forensic Sciences
Date 2013 Jan 3
PMID 23278347
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been minimal research into how to best obtain DNA from touch samples. Many forensic laboratories simply moisten a swab with water and use it for collecting cells/DNA from evidentiary samples. However, this and other methods have not been objectively studied in order to maximize DNA yields. In this study, fingerprints were collected using swabs moistened with water or laboratory or commercially available detergents, including sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Triton X-100, Tween 20, Formula 409(®) , and Simple Green(®) . Prints were swabbed, DNA isolated using an organic extraction, yields quantified, and relative yields compared. In all cases, the detergent-based swabbing solutions outperformed water, with SDS and Triton X-100 producing significant increases in yield. Short tandem repeat profiles were consistent with the individuals that placed them. Subsequent analysis of SDS concentrations for collecting touch DNA demonstrated an increase in DNA yield with increasing SDS concentration, with an optimal concentration of approximately 2%.

Citing Articles

Optimization of a DNA extraction protocol from fingerprints for the analysis of nuclear STR and mitochondrial DNA genetic profiles.

Loarce Y, Rubio P, Sanchez-Sanz A, Higuera A, Rodriguez-Pascual J, Blanco J Forensic Sci Res. 2025; 10(1):owad053.

PMID: 39990696 PMC: 11839504. DOI: 10.1093/fsr/owad053.


Optimization of Binding Buffer Composition (Polyethylene Glycol, Sodium Chloride and pH) for Extraction of DNA from Biological Fluids Using Polyethyleneimine Functionalized Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Based Method.

Khan I, Kaushik G, Verma C, Vashishtha R, Kumar V Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2024; 17:247-258.

PMID: 39703561 PMC: 11656329. DOI: 10.2147/NSA.S494613.


Impact of swabbing solutions on the recovery of biological material from non-porous surfaces.

Kuffel A, Daeid N, Gray A Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024; 9:100551.

PMID: 39281425 PMC: 11399651. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100551.


Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces.

Kuffel A, Daeid N, Gray A Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024; 8:100453.

PMID: 38283046 PMC: 10821607. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100453.


Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention.

Bini C, Giorgetti A, Fazio G, Amurri S, Pelletti G, Pelotti S Int J Legal Med. 2023; 137(3):645-653.

PMID: 36826525 PMC: 9951825. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-02979-2.