» Articles » PMID: 25413130

Automated Detection of Z-axis Coverage with Abdomen-pelvis Computed Tomography Examinations

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Nov 22
PMID 25413130
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Excessive cephalocaudal anatomic (Z-axis) coverage can lead to unnecessary radiation exposure to a patient. In this study, an automated computing model was developed for identifying instances of potentially excessive Z-axis coverage with abdomen-pelvis examinations. Eight patient and imaging attributes including patient gender, age, height, weight, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), maximum abdomen width, and maximum abdomen thickness were used to build a feedforward neural network model to predict a target Z-axis coverage whether it is an excessive or non-excessive Z-axis coverage scans. 264 CT abdomen-pelvis exams were used to develop the model which is validated using 10-fold cross validation. The result showed that 244 out of 264 exams (92.4%) correctly predicted Z-axis excessive coverage. The promising results indicate that this tool has the potential to be used for CT exams of the chest and colon, urography, and other site-specified CT studies having defined limited length.

Citing Articles

Decoding core genes and intercellular communication in osteosarcoma: bioinformatic investigation and immune cell profiling for diagnostic and therapeutic insights.

Rong K, Kuang H, Ou L, Fang R, Kuang J, Yang H Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):609.

PMID: 39485636 PMC: 11530420. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01247-y.


Retrospective analysis of 1118 outpatient chest CT scans to determine factors associated with excess scan length.

Cohen S, Ward T, Makhnevich A, Richardson S, Cham M Clin Imaging. 2020; 62:76-80.

PMID: 32200203 PMC: 7598945. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.11.020.

References
1.
Graser A, Johnson T, Chandarana H, Macari M . Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2008; 19(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1122-7. View

2.
Hara A, Wellnitz C, Paden R, Pavlicek W, Sahani D . Reducing body CT radiation dose: beyond just changing the numbers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201(1):33-40. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10556. View

3.
Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts C, Langer S, Zhang M, Hu M . An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. J Digit Imaging. 2010; 24(2):223-33. PMC: 3056966. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9329-y. View

4.
Ikuta I, Warden G, Andriole K, Khorasani R, Sodickson A . Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates. Radiology. 2013; 270(2):472-80. PMC: 4228751. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122727. View

5.
Manduca A, Yu L, Trzasko J, Khaylova N, Kofler J, McCollough C . Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. Med Phys. 2009; 36(11):4911-9. PMC: 4108640. DOI: 10.1118/1.3232004. View