Retrospective Analysis of 1118 Outpatient Chest CT Scans to Determine Factors Associated with Excess Scan Length

Overview

Journal Clin Imaging

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Radiology

Date 2020 Mar 23

PMID 32200203

Citations 4

Authors

Stuart L Cohen

Thomas J Ward

Alex Makhnevich

Safiya Richardson

Matthew D Cham

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale Objectives: Excess z-axis scanning continues as an unnecessary source of radiation. This study seeks to determine patient, technologist and CT factors that affect excess scan length for chest CT.

Materials And Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 1118 consecutive noncontrast chest CT scans, over twelve consecutive months, was performed for evaluation of scan length above and below the lung parenchyma. Scan length >2 cm was considered excessive. Bivariate analysis for mean excess scan length and presence of excess scan length analyzed technologist's exam volume during the study period, patient age, patient gender, day of week, and time of day as categorical variables. Technologists performing >100 chest CT scans during the study period were considered high-volume while all others were considered low-volume.

Results: Mean excess scan length was 5 mm, 29 mm, and 33 mm above the lungs, below the lungs, and total. 81% and 95% of studies had excess scanning above the lungs and below the lungs respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that high volume technologists, male patients, and patients younger than 65 had a greater amount of excess scan length and presence of excessive scanning above the lungs; high volume technologists and male patients had a greater amount of excess scan length below the lungs, and high volume technologists and patients older than 65 had greater presence of excessive scanning below the lungs, each p < 0.001.

Conclusions: Excess scanning on chest CT is common, varies by patient age and gender and was significantly greater for high volume technologists.

Citing Articles

AI for image quality and patient safety in CT and MRI.

Melazzini L, Bortolotto C, Brizzi L, Achilli M, Basla N, DOnorio De Meo A Eur Radiol Exp. 2025; 9(1):28.

PMID: 39987533 PMC: 11847764. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-025-00562-5.

Redefining Radiation Metrics: Evaluating Actual Doses in Computed Tomography Scans.

Sabiniewicz-Ziajka D, Szarmach A, Grzywinska M, Gac P, Piskunowicz M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38540213 PMC: 10967789. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12030600.

Development of deep learning-assisted overscan decision algorithm in low-dose chest CT: Application to lung cancer screening in Korean National CT accreditation program.

Kim S, Jeong W, Choi J, Kim J, Chun M PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0275531.

PMID: 36174098 PMC: 9522252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275531.

Deep learning-based fully automated Z-axis coverage range definition from scout scans to eliminate overscanning in chest CT imaging.

Salimi Y, Shiri I, Akhavanallaf A, Mansouri Z, Saberi Manesh A, Sanaat A Insights Imaging. 2021; 12(1):162.

PMID: 34743251 PMC: 8572075. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01105-3.

Automatic Scan Range Delimitation in Chest CT Using Deep Learning.

Demircioglu A, Kim M, Stein M, Guberina N, Umutlu L, Nassenstein K Radiol Artif Intell. 2021; 3(3):e200211.

PMID: 34136818 PMC: 8204132. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200211.

References

Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Hamberg L, Blake M, Shepard J . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004; 230(3):619-28. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021726. View

Brenner D, Doll R, Goodhead D, Hall E, Land C, Little J . Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(24):13761-6. PMC: 283495. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2235592100. View

Mascalchi M, Sali L . Lung cancer screening with low dose CT and radiation harm-from prediction models to cancer incidence data. Ann Transl Med. 2017; 5(17):360. PMC: 5599275. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.41. View

Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C . The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007; 167(4):396-416. DOI: 10.1667/RR0553.1. View

. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18-19, 2001. Pediatr Radiol. 2002; 32(4):217-313. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-002-0665-z. View

Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, BERDON W . Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176(2):289-96. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289. View

McCunney R, Li J . Radiation risks in lung cancer screening programs: a comparison with nuclear industry workers and atomic bomb survivors. Chest. 2014; 145(3):618-24. DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1420. View

Kalra M, Maher M, Blake M, Lucey B, Karau K, Toth T . Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):791-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323031563. View

McNitt-Gray M . AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 2002; 22(6):1541-53. DOI: 10.1148/rg.226025128. View

10.

Brassart N, Winant C, Tack D, Gevenois P, De Maertelaer V, Keyzer C . Optimised z-axis coverage at multidetector-row CT in adults suspected of acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86(1028):20130115. PMC: 3745057. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130115. View

11.

Liao E, Quint L, Goodsitt M, Francis I, Khalatbari S, Myles J . Extra Z-axis coverage at CT imaging resulting in excess radiation dose: frequency, degree, and contributory factors. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011; 35(1):50-6. PMC: 3461585. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f5a652. View

12.

Zanca F, Demeter M, Oyen R, Bosmans H . Excess radiation and organ dose in chest and abdominal CT due to CT acquisition beyond expected anatomical boundaries. Eur Radiol. 2011; 22(4):779-88. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2332-y. View

13.

Cohen S, Ward T, Cham M . The relationship between CT scout landmarks and lung boundaries on chest CT: guidelines for minimizing excess z-axis scan length. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(1):581-587. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06394-3. View

14.

Campbell J, Kalra M, Rizzo S, Maher M, Shepard J . Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(6):1525-30. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1512. View

15.

Rampinelli C, De Marco P, Origgi D, Maisonneuve P, Casiraghi M, Veronesi G . Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis. BMJ. 2017; 356:j347. PMC: 5421449. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j347. View

16.

Preston D, Pierce D, Shimizu Y, Cullings H, Fujita S, Funamoto S . Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res. 2004; 162(4):377-89. DOI: 10.1667/rr3232. View

17.

Fintelmann F, Bernheim A, Digumarthy S, Lennes I, Kalra M, Gilman M . The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program. Radiographics. 2015; 35(7):1893-908. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150079. View

18.

Bevelacqua J . Practical and effective ALARA. Health Phys. 2010; 98 Suppl 2:S39-47. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181d18d63. View

19.

Brenner D, Hall E . Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. View

20.

Zhang M, Wellnitz C, Cui C, Pavlicek W, Wu T . Automated detection of z-axis coverage with abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations. J Digit Imaging. 2014; 28(3):362-7. PMC: 4441697. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9743-7. View