» Articles » PMID: 25278959

Statistical Methods for Detecting Differentially Methylated Loci and Regions

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2014 Oct 4
PMID 25278959
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA methylation, the reversible addition of methyl groups at CpG dinucleotides, represents an important regulatory layer associated with gene expression. Changed methylation status has been noted across diverse pathological states, including cancer. The rapid development and uptake of microarrays and large scale DNA sequencing has prompted an explosion of data analytic methods for processing and discovering changes in DNA methylation across varied data types. In this mini-review, we present a compact and accessible discussion of many of the salient challenges, such as experimental design, statistical methods for differential methylation detection, critical considerations such as cell type composition and the potential confounding that can arise from batch effects. From a statistical perspective, our main interests include the use of empirical Bayes or hierarchical models, which have proved immensely powerful in genomics, and the procedures by which false discovery control is achieved.

Citing Articles

A differentially-methylated-region signature predicts the recurrence risk for patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Li H, Luo F, Sun X, Liao C, Wang G, Han Y Aging (Albany NY). 2024; 16(21):13323-13339.

PMID: 39560475 PMC: 11719112. DOI: 10.18632/aging.206139.


Differential methylation region detection via an array-adaptive normalized kernel-weighted model.

Alhassan D, Olbricht G, Adekpedjou A PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0306036.

PMID: 38941289 PMC: 11213316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306036.


Identifying Differential Methylation in Cancer Epigenetics via a Bayesian Functional Regression Model.

Shokoohi F, Stephens D, Greenwood C Biomolecules. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38927043 PMC: 11201607. DOI: 10.3390/biom14060639.


Analysis of DNA methylation at birth and in childhood reveals changes associated with season of birth and latitude.

Kadalayil L, Alam M, White C, Ghantous A, Walton E, Gruzieva O Clin Epigenetics. 2023; 15(1):148.

PMID: 37697338 PMC: 10496224. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-023-01542-5.


Differentially methylated genomic regions of lettuce seeds relate to divergence across morphologically distinct horticultural types.

Simko I AoB Plants. 2023; 15(5):plad060.

PMID: 37680204 PMC: 10482144. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plad060.


References
1.
Riebler A, Menigatti M, Song J, Statham A, Stirzaker C, Mahmud N . BayMeth: improved DNA methylation quantification for affinity capture sequencing data using a flexible Bayesian approach. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(2):R35. PMC: 4053803. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r35. View

2.
Laird P . Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(3):191-203. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2732. View

3.
Ross-Innes C, Stark R, Teschendorff A, Holmes K, Ali H, Dunning M . Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature. 2012; 481(7381):389-93. PMC: 3272464. DOI: 10.1038/nature10730. View

4.
Hebestreit K, Dugas M, Klein H . Detection of significantly differentially methylated regions in targeted bisulfite sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29(13):1647-53. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt263. View

5.
Zou J, Lippert C, Heckerman D, Aryee M, Listgarten J . Epigenome-wide association studies without the need for cell-type composition. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(3):309-11. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2815. View