» Articles » PMID: 24955921

Performance Evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT Scanner with a Focus on High Count-rate Conditions

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2014 Jun 24
PMID 24955921
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging performance of the Ingenuity TF 128 PET/computed tomography (CT) scanner which has a PET component that was designed to support a wider radioactivity range than is possible with those of Gemini TF PET/CT and Ingenuity TF PET/MR. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate characteristics and image quality were evaluated according to the NEMA NU 2-2007 standard and ACR phantom accreditation procedures; these were supplemented by additional measurements intended to characterize the system under conditions that would be encountered during quantitative cardiac imaging with (82)Rb. Image quality was evaluated using a hot spheres phantom, and various contrast recovery and noise measurements were made from replicated images. Timing and energy resolution, dead time, and the linearity of the image activity concentration, were all measured over a wide range of count rates. Spatial resolution (4.8-5.1 mm FWHM), sensitivity (7.3 cps kBq(-1)), peak noise-equivalent count rate (124 kcps), and peak trues rate (365 kcps) were similar to those of the Gemini TF PET/CT. Contrast recovery was higher with a 2 mm, body-detail reconstruction than with a 4 mm, body reconstruction, although the precision was reduced. The noise equivalent count rate peak was broad (within 10% of peak from 241-609 MBq). The activity measured in phantom images was within 10% of the true activity for count rates up to those observed in (82)Rb cardiac PET studies.

Citing Articles

Optimizing Low-Dose [18F]FDG-PET/CT Scans: Ensuring Quality Amid Radiotracer Availability Challenges - Insights from a Peripheral Tertiary Care Center.

Tayal S, Jain Y, Thakur S, Shukla V, Venkatachalam M, Kumar A Indian J Nucl Med. 2025; 39(4):292-298.

PMID: 39790828 PMC: 11708796. DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_90_24.


Kinetic Analysis and Metabolism of Poly(Adenosine Diphosphate-Ribose) Polymerase-1-Targeted F-Fluorthanatrace PET in Breast Cancer.

Young A, Pantel A, Kiani M, Doot R, Bagheri S, Pryma D J Nucl Med. 2024; 65(12):1862-1868.

PMID: 39477499 PMC: 11619586. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268254.


StepBrain: A 3-Dimensionally Printed Multicompartmental Anthropomorphic Brain Phantom to Simulate PET Activity Distributions.

Pirozzi M, Gaudieri V, Prinster A, Magliulo M, Cuocolo A, Brunetti A J Nucl Med. 2024; 65(9):1489-1492.

PMID: 39025647 PMC: 11372253. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267277.


PET detectors with depth-of-interaction and time-of-flight capabilities.

Yoshida E, Yamaya T Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 17(3):596-609.

PMID: 38888821 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00821-x.


Evaluation of cost-effective system designs for long axial field-of-view PET scanners.

Surti S, Werner M, Karp J Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(10).

PMID: 37084744 PMC: 10231377. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/accf5d.


References
1.
Curillova Z, Yaman B, Dorbala S, Kwong R, Sitek A, El Fakhri G . Quantitative relationship between coronary calcium content and coronary flow reserve as assessed by integrated PET/CT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 36(10):1603-10. PMC: 3117296. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1121-1. View

2.
Raylman R, Caraher J, Hutchins G . Sampling requirements for dynamic cardiac PET studies using image-derived input functions. J Nucl Med. 1993; 34(3):440-7. View

3.
Boellaard R . Need for standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52 Suppl 2:93S-100S. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085662. View

4.
Zaidi H, Ojha N, Morich M, Griesmer J, Hu Z, Maniawski P . Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET-MRI system. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(10):3091-106. PMC: 4059360. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/013. View

5.
Boellaard R, ODoherty M, Weber W, Mottaghy F, Lonsdale M, Stroobants S . FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 37(1):181-200. PMC: 2791475. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4. View