» Articles » PMID: 12368380

PET Performance Measurements Using the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2002 Oct 10
PMID 12368380
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The NU 2-1994 standard document for PET performance measurements has recently been updated. The updated document, NU 2-2001, includes revised measurements for spatial resolution, intrinsic scatter fraction, sensitivity, counting rate performance, and accuracy of count loss and randoms corrections. The revised measurements are designed to allow testing of dedicated PET systems in both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional modes as well as coincidence gamma cameras, conditions not considered in the original NU 2-1994 standard. In addition, the updated measurements strive toward being more representative of clinical studies, in particular, whole-body imaging.

Methods: Performance measurements following the NU 2-1994 and NU 2-2001 standards were performed on several different PET scanners. Differences between the procedures and resulting performance characteristics, as well as the rationale for these changes, were noted.

Results: Spatial resolution is measured with a point source in all 3 directions, rather than a line source, as specified previously. For the measurements of intrinsic scatter fraction, sensitivity, and counting rate performance, a 70-cm line source is now specified, instead of a 19-cm-long cylindric phantom. The longer configuration permits measurement of these performance characteristics over the entire axial field of view of all current PET scanners and incorporates the effects of activity outside the scanner. A measurement of image quality has been added in an effort to measure overall image quality under clinically realistic conditions. This measurement replaces the individual measurements of uniformity and of the accuracy of corrections for attenuation and scatter.

Conclusion: The changes from the NU 2-1994 standard to the NU 2-2001 standard strive toward establishing relevance with clinical studies. The tests in the updated standard also are, in general, simpler and less time-consuming to perform than those in the NU 2-1994 standard.

Citing Articles

Partial volume correction of PET image data using geometric transfer matrices based on uniform B-splines.

Mandeville J, Efthimiou N, Weigand-Whittier J, Hardy E, Knudsen G, Jorgensen L Phys Med Biol. 2024; 69(5).

PMID: 38271737 PMC: 10936689. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad22a0.


Operational and Performance Experience with uMI550 Digital PET-CT during Routine Quality Control Procedures.

Singh M, Mohan V, Kaushik C World J Nucl Med. 2023; 22(4):267-275.

PMID: 38152105 PMC: 10751135. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777696.


Comparative analysis of batch correction methods for FDG PET/CT using metabolic radiogenomic data of lung cancer patients.

Lee H, Seo S, Won S, Park W, Choi J, Lee K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18247.

PMID: 37880322 PMC: 10600181. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45296-9.


The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on F-FDG images using a BGO-based PET/CT scanner: a phantom and clinical study.

Sadeghi F, Sheikhzadeh P, Farzanehfar S, Ghafarian P, Moafpurian Y, Ay M EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):63.

PMID: 37843705 PMC: 10579211. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00587-y.


Phantom and clinical evaluation of Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) reconstruction algorithm in 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT studies.

Sadeghi F, Sheikhzadeh P, Kasraie N, Farzanehfar S, Abbasi M, Salehi Y Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 46(3):1297-1308.

PMID: 37439965 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01299-4.