» Articles » PMID: 24579148

Representation Learning: a Unified Deep Learning Framework for Automatic Prostate MR Segmentation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Mar 1
PMID 24579148
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Image representation plays an important role in medical image analysis. The key to the success of different medical image analysis algorithms is heavily dependent on how we represent the input data, namely features used to characterize the input image. In the literature, feature engineering remains as an active research topic, and many novel hand-crafted features are designed such as Haar wavelet, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary patterns. However, such features are not designed with the guidance of the underlying dataset at hand. To this end, we argue that the most effective features should be designed in a learning based manner, namely representation learning, which can be adapted to different patient datasets at hand. In this paper, we introduce a deep learning framework to achieve this goal. Specifically, a stacked independent subspace analysis (ISA) network is adopted to learn the most effective features in a hierarchical and unsupervised manner. The learnt features are adapted to the dataset at hand and encode high level semantic anatomical information. The proposed method is evaluated on the application of automatic prostate MR segmentation. Experimental results show that significant segmentation accuracy improvement can be achieved by the proposed deep learning method compared to other state-of-the-art segmentation approaches.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in artificial intelligent strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Gharibshahian M, Torkashvand M, Bavisi M, Aldaghi N, Alizadeh A Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(9):e70016.

PMID: 39189880 PMC: 11348508. DOI: 10.1111/srt.70016.


Survey of methods and principles in three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional medical images.

Sarmah M, Neelima A, Singh H Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2023; 6(1):15.

PMID: 37495817 PMC: 10371974. DOI: 10.1186/s42492-023-00142-7.


A Study on the Effectiveness of Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Methods for Breast Ultrasonography.

Yun C, Eom B, Park S, Kim C, Kim D, Jabeen F Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(5).

PMID: 36905074 PMC: 10007509. DOI: 10.3390/s23052864.


Deep learning-based dominant index lesion segmentation for MR-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Simeth J, Jiang J, Nosov A, Wibmer A, Zelefsky M, Tyagi N Med Phys. 2023; 50(8):4854-4870.

PMID: 36856092 PMC: 11098147. DOI: 10.1002/mp.16320.


Generative adversarial networks with adaptive normalization for synthesizing T2-weighted magnetic resonance images from diffusion-weighted images.

Mao Y, Chen C, Wang Z, Cheng D, You P, Huang X Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1058487.

PMID: 36452330 PMC: 9704724. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1058487.


References
1.
Shen D, Davatzikos C . HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 21(11):1421-39. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2002.803111. View

2.
Hinton G, Osindero S, Teh Y . A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 2006; 18(7):1527-54. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527. View

3.
Liao S, Gao Y, Shen D . Sparse patch based prostate segmentation in CT images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013; 15(Pt 3):385-92. PMC: 3539236. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_48. View

4.
Rousseau F, Habas P, Studholme C . A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011; 30(10):1852-62. PMC: 3318921. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2156806. View

5.
Zhang S, Zhan Y, Dewan M, Huang J, Metaxas D, Zhou X . Towards robust and effective shape modeling: sparse shape composition. Med Image Anal. 2011; 16(1):265-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.08.004. View