» Articles » PMID: 24441054

UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk-sharing Scheme: a New Natural History Dataset and an Improved Markov Model

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Jan 21
PMID 24441054
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: In 2002, the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence concluded that the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapies; interferon-β and glatiramer acetate, were not cost effective over the short term but recognised that reducing disability over the longer term might dramatically improve the cost effectiveness. The UK Risk-sharing Scheme (RSS) was established to ensure cost-effective provision by prospectively collecting disability-related data from UK-treated patients with MS and comparing findings to a natural history (untreated) cohort. However, deficiencies were found in the originally selected untreated cohort and the resulting analytical approach. This study aims to identify a more suitable natural history cohort and to develop a robust analytical approach using the new cohort.

Design: The Scientific Advisory Group, recommended the British Columbia Multiple Sclerosis (BCMS) database, Canada, as providing a more suitable natural history comparator cohort. Transition probabilities were derived and different Markov models (discrete and continuous) with and without baseline covariates were applied.

Setting: MS clinics in Canada and the UK.

Participants: From the BCMS database, 898 'untreated' patients with MS considered eligible for drug treatment based on the UK's Association of British Neurologists criteria.

Outcome Measure: The predicted Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was collected and assessed for goodness of fit when compared with actual outcome.

Results: The BCMS untreated cohort contributed 7335 EDSS scores over a median 6.4 years (6357 EDSS 'transitions' recorded at consecutive visits) during the period 1980-1995. A continuous Markov model with 'onset age' as a binary covariate was deemed the most suitable model for future RSS analysis.

Conclusions: A new untreated MS cohort from British Columbia has been selected and will be modelled using a continuous Markov model with onset age as a baseline covariate. This approach will now be applied to the treated UK RSS MS cohort for future price adjustment calculations.

Citing Articles

Cost-consequence analysis of early vs. delayed natalizumab use in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a simulation study.

Inojosa H, Schriefer D, Ness N, Dillenseger A, Akgun K, Ziemssen T J Neurol. 2025; 272(2):153.

PMID: 39821478 PMC: 11742466. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12723-4.


Development of a predictive model for predicting disability after optic neuritis: a secondary analysis of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.

Wei S, Du Y, Luo M, Song R Front Neurol. 2024; 14:1326261.

PMID: 38268999 PMC: 10807422. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1326261.


Cost-effectiveness of ocrelizumab for treatment of Iranian patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Ayati N, Taheri S, Sahraian M, Nikfar S Curr J Neurol. 2023; 20(3):154-161.

PMID: 38011445 PMC: 8984785. DOI: 10.18502/cjn.v20i3.7691.


Cladribine tablets are a cost-effective strategy in high-disease activity relapsing multiple sclerosis patients in Iran.

Ayati N, Fleifel L, Sharifi S, Sahraian M, Nikfar S Curr J Neurol. 2023; 20(3):146-153.

PMID: 38011415 PMC: 8984780. DOI: 10.18502/cjn.v20i3.7690.


Longitudinal Fluctuations in Treatment Response After OnabotulinumToxinA and Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Urgency Incontinence.

Hendrickson W, Zhang C, Jelovsek J, Nygaard I, Presson A J Urol. 2023; 211(1):134-143.

PMID: 37871326 PMC: 10842509. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003746.


References
1.
Poser C, Paty D, Scheinberg L, McDonald W, Davis F, Ebers G . New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983; 13(3):227-31. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410130302. View

2.
. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology. 1993; 43(4):655-61. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.43.4.655. View

3.
Chilcott J, McCabe C, Tappenden P, OHagan A, Cooper N, Abrams K . Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. Commentary: evaluating disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. BMJ. 2003; 326(7388):522; discussion 522. PMC: 150460. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.522. View

4.
. Randomized controlled trial of interferon- beta-1a in secondary progressive MS: Clinical results. Neurology. 2001; 56(11):1496-504. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.11.1496. View

5.
Boggild M, Palace J, Barton P, Ben-Shlomo Y, Bregenzer T, Dobson C . Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: two year results of clinical cohort study with historical comparator. BMJ. 2009; 339:b4677. PMC: 2787922. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4677. View