» Articles » PMID: 31839981

Glatiramer Acetate As a Clinically and Cost-effective Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis over 10 Years of Use Within the National Health Service: Final Results from the UK Risk Sharing Scheme

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 17
PMID 31839981
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The UK Risk Sharing Scheme (RSS) provided information on the effect of first-line multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying treatments on long-term disability.

Objective: The aim is to provide results specific to glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone®) from the final 10-year analysis of the RSS.

Methods: A Markov model was used to assess clinical effectiveness measured as Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and utility loss. Untreated patients from the British Columbia MS cohort (1980-1995) were used as a 'virtual comparator' group. A separate Markov model assessed cost-effectiveness, based on a 50-year time horizon (with a 50% treatment waning effect imposed at 10 years) and using NHS list price (£513.95 per 28 days). Results were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

Results: In total, 755 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) received GA, with a mean follow-up of 7.1 (standard deviation 1.3) years. EDSS progression was reduced by 23% (progression ratio 76.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 69.0-84.3) and utility loss by 39% (progression ratio 61.0, 95% CI 52.7-69.3) compared with no treatment. There was no persistent waning in GA treatment effect over time (EDSS:  = 0.093; utilities:  = 0.119). The cost per QALY was £17,841.

Conclusion: GA had a beneficial effect on long-term disability and was a cost-effective treatment for RRMS.

Citing Articles

Evidence Following Conditional NICE Technology Appraisal Recommendations: A Critical Analysis of Methods, Quality and Risk of Bias.

Pijeira Perez Y, Hughes D Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(12):1373-1394.

PMID: 39249730 PMC: 11564307. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01418-3.


Cost associated with a relapse-free patient in multiple sclerosis: A real-world health indicator.

Romero-Pinel L, Bau L, Matas E, Leon I, Juvany R, Jodar R PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0267504.

PMID: 35486620 PMC: 9053779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267504.


How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.

Wiyani A, Badgujar L, Khurana V, Adlard N Neurol Ther. 2021; 10(2):557-583.

PMID: 34279847 PMC: 8571458. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1.

References
1.
Inusah S, Sormani M, Cofield S, Aban I, Musani S, Srinivasasainagendra V . Assessing changes in relapse rates in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2010; 16(12):1414-21. DOI: 10.1177/1352458510379246. View

2.
Ford C, Goodman A, Johnson K, Kachuck N, Lindsey J, Lisak R . Continuous long-term immunomodulatory therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis: results from the 15-year analysis of the US prospective open-label study of glatiramer acetate. Mult Scler. 2010; 16(3):342-50. PMC: 2850588. DOI: 10.1177/1352458509358088. View

3.
Tramacere I, Del Giovane C, Salanti G, DAmico R, Filippini G . Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (9):CD011381. PMC: 9235409. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub2. View

4.
Arnal-Garcia C, Amigo-Jorrin M, Lopez-Real A, Lema-Devesa C, Llopis N, Sanchez-de la Rosa R . Long-term effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in clinical practice conditions. J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 21(12):2212-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.045. View

5.
Chilcott J, McCabe C, Tappenden P, OHagan A, Cooper N, Abrams K . Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. Commentary: evaluating disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. BMJ. 2003; 326(7388):522; discussion 522. PMC: 150460. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.522. View