» Articles » PMID: 24351172

In Silico Optimization of Basal Insulin Infusion Rate During Exercise: Implication for Artificial Pancreas

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2013 Dec 20
PMID 24351172
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several clinical trials have been performed to assess safety and efficacy of closed-loop control. Some included physical activity (PA), with the goal of challenging the control algorithms with a rapid change in insulin sensitivity while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. However, the question remains as to the necessity to inform the control algorithm on the imminent PA. The aim here is to assess in silico (i) if it is necessary to announce upcoming PA and (ii) if this is the case, what is the safest strategy of basal insulin reduction in the context of the closed-loop control.

Methods: We modified the University of Virginia/Padova type 1 diabetes simulator to incorporate the effect of PA based on a study in healthy subjects that demonstrated an almost doubling of insulin sensitivity during PA versus rest. Two in silico experiments, including a PA session, have been simulated on the virtual adult population: one in the absence of and one with different degrees of reductions and durations of basal insulin infusion rates.

Results: Most in silico subjects experienced hypoglycemia in the absence of basal insulin adjustment. We show that, in the absence of patient-specific information, a safe and effective strategy is to reduce basal insulin by 50% starting 90 min before exercise and by 30% during exercise.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that control algorithms could benefit by knowing an upcoming PA. Ideally, the control algorithm should be informed about the patient-specific basal insulin reduction pattern. An alternative strategy that has been proposed here has been deemed safe and effective in in silico experiments.

Citing Articles

Protective effects of physical activity against health risks associated with type 1 diabetes: "Health benefits outweigh the risks".

Wake A World J Diabetes. 2022; 13(3):161-184.

PMID: 35432757 PMC: 8984568. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i3.161.


Glucose Prediction under Variable-Length Time-Stamped Daily Events: A Seasonal Stochastic Local Modeling Framework.

Montaser E, Diez J, Bondia J Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(9).

PMID: 34064325 PMC: 8124701. DOI: 10.3390/s21093188.


Simulation Software for Assessment of Nonlinear and Adaptive Multivariable Control Algorithms: Glucose - Insulin Dynamics in Type 1 Diabetes.

Rashid M, Samadi S, Sevil M, Hajizadeh I, Kolodziej P, Hobbs N Comput Chem Eng. 2020; 130.

PMID: 32863472 PMC: 7449052. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106565.


Closed-Loop Control with Unannounced Exercise for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes using the Ensemble Model Predictive Control.

Garcia-Tirado J, Corbett J, Boiroux D, Jorgensen J, Breton M J Process Control. 2020; 80:202-210.

PMID: 32831483 PMC: 7437946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.05.017.


Artificial Pancreas Systems and Physical Activity in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Challenges, Adopted Approaches, and Future Perspectives.

Tagougui S, Taleb N, Molvau J, Nguyen E, Raffray M, Rabasa-Lhoret R J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019; 13(6):1077-1090.

PMID: 31409125 PMC: 6835182. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819869310.


References
1.
Schiavon M, Hinshaw L, Mallad A, Dalla Man C, Sparacino G, Johnson M . Postprandial glucose fluxes and insulin sensitivity during exercise: a study in healthy individuals. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 305(4):E557-66. PMC: 3891224. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00182.2013. View

2.
Luijf Y, DeVries J, Zwinderman K, Leelarathna L, Nodale M, Caldwell K . Day and night closed-loop control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a comparison of two closed-loop algorithms driving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus patient self-management. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(12):3882-7. PMC: 3836152. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-1956. View

3.
Dalla Man C, Micheletto F, Lv D, Breton M, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C . The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: New Features. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(1):26-34. PMC: 4454102. DOI: 10.1177/1932296813514502. View

4.
Weinzimer S, Steil G, Swan K, Dziura J, Kurtz N, Tamborlane W . Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(5):934-9. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1967. View

5.
Steil G, Rebrin K, Darwin C, Hariri F, Saad M . Feasibility of automating insulin delivery for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006; 55(12):3344-50. DOI: 10.2337/db06-0419. View