» Articles » PMID: 19444330

In Silico Preclinical Trials: a Proof of Concept in Closed-loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2009 May 16
PMID 19444330
Citations 225
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arguably, a minimally invasive system using subcutaneous (s.c.) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and s.c. insulin delivery via insulin pump would be a most feasible step to closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Consequently, diabetes technology is focusing on developing an artificial pancreas using control algorithms to link CGM with s.c. insulin delivery. The future development of the artificial pancreas will be greatly accelerated by employing mathematical modeling and computer simulation. Realistic computer simulation is capable of providing invaluable information about the safety and the limitations of closed-loop control algorithms, guiding clinical studies, and out-ruling ineffective control scenarios in a cost-effective manner. Thus computer simulation testing of closed-loop control algorithms is regarded as a prerequisite to clinical trials of the artificial pancreas. In this paper, we present a system for in silico testing of control algorithms that has three principal components: (1) a large cohort of n=300 simulated "subjects" (n=100 adults, 100 adolescents, and 100 children) based on real individuals' data and spanning the observed variability of key metabolic parameters in the general population of people with T1DM; (2) a simulator of CGM sensor errors representative of Freestyle Navigator™, Guardian RT, or Dexcom™ STS™, 7-day sensor; and (3) a simulator of discrete s.c. insulin delivery via OmniPod Insulin Management System or Deltec Cozmo(®) insulin pump. The system has been shown to represent adequate glucose fluctuations in T1DM observed during meal challenges, and has been accepted by the Food and Drug Administration as a substitute to animal trials in the preclinical testing of closed-loop control strategies.

Citing Articles

In Silico Evaluation of Algorithm-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Dorosan M, Chen Y, Zhuang Q, Lam S JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e63875.

PMID: 39819973 PMC: 11783031. DOI: 10.2196/63875.


Simulation of clinical trials of oral treprostinil in pulmonary arterial hypertension using a virtual population.

Stine A, Parmar J, Smith A, Cummins Z, Pillalamarri N, Bender R NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2025; 11(1):9.

PMID: 39814773 PMC: 11735615. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00481-y.


Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.

Knapp A, Cruz D, Mehrad B, Laubenbacher R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39574674 PMC: 11580862. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.31.596692.


Analysis of Glucose Responsive Glucagon Therapeutics using Computational Models of the Glucoregulatory System.

Alizadehmojarad A, Yang S, Gong X, Strano M Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 13(29):e2401410.

PMID: 39205540 PMC: 11582512. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202401410.


Anti-windup strategies for biomolecular control systems facilitated by model reduction theory for sequestration networks.

Filo M, Gupta A, Khammash M Sci Adv. 2024; 10(34):eadl5439.

PMID: 39167660 PMC: 11338268. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl5439.


References
1.
Cheyne E, Cavan D, Kerr D . Performance of a continuous glucose monitoring system during controlled hypoglycaemia in healthy volunteers. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2002; 4(5):607-13. DOI: 10.1089/152091502320798222. View

2.
Kraegen E, Campbell L, Chia Y, Meler H, Lazarus L . Control of blood glucose in diabetics using an artificial pancreas. Aust N Z J Med. 1977; 7(3):280-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1977.tb03687.x. View

3.
Hovorka R, Canonico V, Chassin L, Haueter U, Massi-Benedetti M, Federici M . Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Physiol Meas. 2004; 25(4):905-20. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/4/010. View

4.
Clarke W, Anderson S, Farhy L, Breton M, Gonder-Frederick L, Cox D . Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(10):2412-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2412. View

5.
Magni L, Raimondo D, Dalla Man C, Breton M, Patek S, De Nicolao G . Evaluating the efficacy of closed-loop glucose regulation via control-variability grid analysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009; 2(4):630-5. PMC: 2769756. DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200414. View