» Articles » PMID: 20138357

Manual Closed-loop Insulin Delivery in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: a Phase 2 Randomised Crossover Trial

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Feb 9
PMID 20138357
Citations 157
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Closed-loop systems link continuous glucose measurements to insulin delivery. We aimed to establish whether closed-loop insulin delivery could control overnight blood glucose in young people.

Methods: We undertook three randomised crossover studies in 19 patients aged 5-18 years with type 1 diabetes of duration 6.4 years (SD 4.0). We compared standard continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and closed-loop delivery (n=13; APCam01); closed-loop delivery after rapidly and slowly absorbed meals (n=7; APCam02); and closed-loop delivery and standard treatment after exercise (n=10; APCam03). Allocation was by computer-generated random code. Participants were masked to plasma and sensor glucose. In APCam01, investigators were masked to plasma glucose. During closed-loop nights, glucose measurements were fed every 15 min into a control algorithm calculating rate of insulin infusion, and a nurse adjusted the insulin pump. During control nights, patients' standard pump settings were applied. Primary outcomes were time for which plasma glucose concentration was 3.91-8.00 mmol/L or 3.90 mmol/L or lower. Analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN18155883.

Findings: 17 patients were studied for 33 closed-loop and 21 continuous infusion nights. Primary outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups in APCam01 (12 analysed; target range, median 52% [IQR 43-83] closed loop vs 39% [15-51] standard treatment, p=0.06; <or=3.90 mmol/L, 1% [0-7] vs 2% [0-41], p=0.13), APCam02 (six analysed; target range, rapidly 53% [48-57] vs slowly absorbed meal 55% [37-64], p=0.97; <or=3.90 mmol/L, 0% [0-4] vs 0% [0-0], p=0.16]), and APCam03 (nine analysed; target range 78% [60-92] closed loop vs 43% [25-65] control, p=0.0245, not significant at corrected level; <or=3.90 mmol/L, 10% [2-15] vs 6% [0-44], p=0.27). A secondary analysis of pooled data documented increased time in the target range (60% [51-88] vs 40% [18-61]; p=0.0022) and reduced time for which glucose concentrations were 3.90 mmol/L or lower (2.1% (0.0-10.0) vs 4.1% (0.0-42.0); p=0.0304). No events with plasma glucose concentration lower than 3.0 mmol/L were recorded during closed-loop delivery, compared with nine events during standard treatment.

Interpretation: Closed-loop systems could reduce risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Funding: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation; European Foundation for Study of Diabetes; Medical Research Council Centre for Obesity and Related Metabolic Diseases; National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre.

Citing Articles

Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches for the Real-Time Detection of Undesired Insulin Suspension Caused by Malfunctions.

Idi E, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Del Favero S J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241248402.

PMID: 38682800 PMC: 11571563. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241248402.


Closed-loop insulin delivery: update on the state of the field and emerging technologies.

Ware J, Hovorka R Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022; 19(11):859-875.

PMID: 36331211 PMC: 9780196. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2142556.


Patient reported outcome measures in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using advanced hybrid closed loop insulin delivery.

Gianini A, Suklan J, Skela-Savic B, Klemencic S, Battelino T, Dovc K Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:967725.

PMID: 36060958 PMC: 9437950. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.967725.


Precision medicine in type 1 diabetes.

Carr A, Evans-Molina C, Oram R Diabetologia. 2022; 65(11):1854-1866.

PMID: 35994083 PMC: 9522741. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05778-3.


Semi-Implantable Bioelectronics.

Fang J, Huang S, Liu F, He G, Li X, Huang X Nanomicro Lett. 2022; 14(1):125.

PMID: 35633391 PMC: 9148344. DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00818-4.