» Articles » PMID: 24322569

Overdiagnosis in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

Overview
Journal JAMA Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Dec 11
PMID 24322569
Citations 328
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Screening for lung cancer has the potential to reduce mortality, but in addition to detecting aggressive tumors, screening will also detect indolent tumors that otherwise may not cause clinical symptoms. These overdiagnosis cases represent an important potential harm of screening because they incur additional cost, anxiety, and morbidity associated with cancer treatment.

Objective: To estimate overdiagnosis in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).

Design, Setting, And Participants: We used data from the NLST, a randomized trial comparing screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) vs chest radiography (CXR) among 53 452 persons at high risk for lung cancer observed for 6.4 years, to estimate the excess number of lung cancers in the LDCT arm of the NLST compared with the CXR arm.

Main Outcomes And Measures: We calculated 2 measures of overdiagnosis: the probability that a lung cancer detected by screening with LDCT is an overdiagnosis (PS), defined as the excess lung cancers detected by LDCT divided by all lung cancers detected by screening in the LDCT arm; and the number of cases that were considered overdiagnosis relative to the number of persons needed to screen to prevent 1 death from lung cancer.

Results: During follow-up, 1089 lung cancers were reported in the LDCT arm and 969 in the CXR arm of the NLST. The probability is 18.5% (95% CI, 5.4%-30.6%) that any lung cancer detected by screening with LDCT was an overdiagnosis, 22.5% (95% CI, 9.7%-34.3%) that a non-small cell lung cancer detected by LDCT was an overdiagnosis, and 78.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-93.5%) that a bronchioalveolar lung cancer detected by LDCT was an overdiagnosis. The number of cases of overdiagnosis found among the 320 participants who would need to be screened in the NLST to prevent 1 death from lung cancer was 1.38.

Conclusions And Relevance: More than 18% of all lung cancers detected by LDCT in the NLST seem to be indolent, and overdiagnosis should be considered when describing the risks of LDCT screening for lung cancer.

Citing Articles

The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection.

Schafer H, Lajmi N, Valente P, Pedrioli A, Cigoianu D, Hoehne B Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075895 PMC: 11899545. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050648.


Lung cancer screening in people who have never smoked: lessons from East Asia.

Welch H, Gao W, Wilder F, Kim S, Silvestri G BMJ. 2025; 388:e081674.

PMID: 39914848 PMC: 11800067. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081674.


Minimally invasive biomarkers for triaging lung nodules-challenges and future perspectives.

Afridi W, Picos S, Bark J, Stamoudis D, Vasani S, Irwin D Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025; 44(1):29.

PMID: 39888565 PMC: 11785609. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-025-10247-5.


Assessing the 9G Technology Blood Test for Predicting Lung Cancer in Patients with CT-Detected Lung Nodules: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Kim S, Park Y, Kim I, Kim H, Lee K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39594693 PMC: 11593157. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223737.


Changes in Staging and Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Following the Implementation of Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.

Chen C, Hsu J, Shen Y, Hsu C, Kao S, Lai W Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39594683 PMC: 11592150. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223727.


References
1.
Aberle D, Adams A, Berg C, Black W, Clapp J, Fagerstrom R . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):395-409. PMC: 4356534. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. View

2.
Bach P, Mirkin J, Oliver T, Azzoli C, Berry D, Brawley O . Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012; 307(22):2418-29. PMC: 3709596. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5521. View

3.
Sagawa M, Tsubono Y, Saito Y, Sato M, Tsuji I, Takahashi S . A case-control study for evaluating the efficacy of mass screening program for lung cancer in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Cancer. 2001; 92(3):588-94. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<588::aid-cncr1358>3.0.co;2-8. View

4.
Bleyer A, Welch H . Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(21):1998-2005. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809. View

5.
FONTANA R, SANDERSON D, WOOLNER L, Taylor W, Miller W, Muhm J . Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project. Cancer. 1991; 67(4 Suppl):1155-64. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4+<1155::aid-cncr2820671509>3.0.co;2-0. View