» Articles » PMID: 39594693

Assessing the 9G Technology Blood Test for Predicting Lung Cancer in Patients with CT-Detected Lung Nodules: A Multicenter Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39594693
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Lung nodules detected by chest computed tomography (CT) often require invasive biopsies for definitive diagnosis, leading to unnecessary procedures for benign lesions. A blood-based biomarker test that predicts lung cancer risk in CT-detected nodules could help stratify patients and direct invasive diagnostics toward high-risk individuals. : In this multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial, we evaluated a test measuring plasma levels of p53, anti-p53 autoantibodies, CYFRA 21-1, and anti-CYFRA 21-1 autoantibodies in patients with CT-detected lung nodules. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated, and subgroup analyses by gender, age, and smoking status were performed. A total of 1132 patients who had CT-detected lung nodules, including 885 lung cancer cases and 247 benign lesions, were enrolled from two academic hospitals in South Korea. : The test demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.4% (95% CI: 75.7-81.1) and specificity of 93.1% (95% CI: 90.0-96.3) in predicting lung cancer in CT-detected nodules. The PPV was 97.6%, and the NPV was 54.6%. Performance was consistent across gender (sensitivity 79.3% in men and 76.8% in women) and age groups, with a specificity of 93.4% in men and 92.7% in women. Stage I lung cancer was detected with a sensitivity of 80.6%. : The Lung Cancer test based on 9G technology presented here offers a non-invasive method for stratifying lung cancer risk in patients with CT-detected nodules. Its integration into clinical practice could reduce unnecessary interventions and foster earlier detection.

References
1.
Aberle D, Adams A, Berg C, Black W, Clapp J, Fagerstrom R . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):395-409. PMC: 4356534. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. View

2.
Wu Z, Tan F, Xie Y, Tang W, Wang F, Xu Y . A strategy to reduce the false-positive rate after low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer screening: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Cancer Med. 2023; 12(13):14781-14793. PMC: 10358224. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6106. View

3.
Baldwin D, Callister M, Crosbie P, ODowd E, Rintoul R, Robbins H . Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: the importance of study design. Eur Respir J. 2021; 57(1). PMC: 7968073. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04367-2020. View

4.
Gonzalez Maldonado S, Motsch E, Trotter A, Kauczor H, Heussel C, Hermann S . Overdiagnosis in lung cancer screening: Estimates from the German Lung Cancer Screening Intervention Trial. Int J Cancer. 2020; 148(5):1097-1105. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33295. View

5.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21442. View