» Articles » PMID: 21714641

Reduced Lung-cancer Mortality with Low-dose Computed Tomographic Screening

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Jul 1
PMID 21714641
Citations 4137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer.

Methods: From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U.S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009.

Results: The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P=0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P=0.02).

Conclusions: Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; National Lung Screening Trial ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385.).

Citing Articles

A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.

Kotoulas S, Spyratos D, Porpodis K, Domvri K, Boutou A, Kaimakamis E Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075729 PMC: 11898928. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050882.


Data augmented lung cancer prediction framework using the nested case control NLST cohort.

Jiang Y, Manem V Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1492758.

PMID: 40071099 PMC: 11893409. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1492758.


Use of the Hounsfield unit scale in differentiating transudate and exudate in pleural effusion in the emergency department.

Isik N, Ozkan E, Ucgun A, Turan O, Donmez S, Yavuz Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(10):e41822.

PMID: 40068056 PMC: 11902926. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041822.


Preoperative computed tomography-guided soft hook-wire localization for multiple pulmonary nodules.

Li G, Wu Z, Shi Y, Wang J, Fu Y Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1501165.

PMID: 40061898 PMC: 11886374. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1501165.


Two-phase radial endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy registration.

Zhao W, Kuhlengel T, Chang Q, Daneshpajooh V, He Y, Kao A J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025; 12(2):025001.

PMID: 40061857 PMC: 11889395. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.2.025001.


References
1.
Bach P, Cramer L, Schrag D, Downey R, Gelfand S, Begg C . The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(3):181-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200107193450306. View

2.
Marchiano A, Calabro E, Civelli E, Di Tolla G, Frigerio L, Morosi C . Pulmonary nodules: volume repeatability at multidetector CT lung cancer screening. Radiology. 2009; 251(3):919-25. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2513081313. View

3.
Aberle D, Adams A, Berg C, Clapp J, Clingan K, Gareen I . Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(23):1771-9. PMC: 2994863. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq434. View

4.
Gierada D, Garg K, Nath H, Strollo D, Fagerstrom R, Ford M . CT quality assurance in the lung screening study component of the National Lung Screening Trial: implications for multicenter imaging trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(2):419-24. PMC: 2841058. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1995. View

5.
Jemal A, Center M, DeSantis C, Ward E . Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(8):1893-907. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437. View