» Articles » PMID: 24155158

Blind Prediction of Interfacial Water Positions in CAPRI

Abstract

We report the first assessment of blind predictions of water positions at protein-protein interfaces, performed as part of the critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI) community-wide experiment. Groups submitting docking predictions for the complex of the DNase domain of colicin E2 and Im2 immunity protein (CAPRI Target 47), were invited to predict the positions of interfacial water molecules using the method of their choice. The predictions-20 groups submitted a total of 195 models-were assessed by measuring the recall fraction of water-mediated protein contacts. Of the 176 high- or medium-quality docking models-a very good docking performance per se-only 44% had a recall fraction above 0.3, and a mere 6% above 0.5. The actual water positions were in general predicted to an accuracy level no better than 1.5 Å, and even in good models about half of the contacts represented false positives. This notwithstanding, three hotspot interface water positions were quite well predicted, and so was one of the water positions that is believed to stabilize the loop that confers specificity in these complexes. Overall the best interface water predictions was achieved by groups that also produced high-quality docking models, indicating that accurate modelling of the protein portion is a determinant factor. The use of established molecular mechanics force fields, coupled to sampling and optimization procedures also seemed to confer an advantage. Insights gained from this analysis should help improve the prediction of protein-water interactions and their role in stabilizing protein complexes.

Citing Articles

Impact of AlphaFold on structure prediction of protein complexes: The CASP15-CAPRI experiment.

Lensink M, Brysbaert G, Raouraoua N, Bates P, Giulini M, Honorato R Proteins. 2023; 91(12):1658-1683.

PMID: 37905971 PMC: 10841881. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26609.


Critical Assessment of Methods for Predicting the 3D Structure of Proteins and Protein Complexes.

Wodak S, Vajda S, Lensink M, Kozakov D, Bates P Annu Rev Biophys. 2023; 52:183-206.

PMID: 36626764 PMC: 10885158. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-102622-084607.


Protein-protein interaction prediction methods: from docking-based to AI-based approaches.

Tsuchiya Y, Yamamori Y, Tomii K Biophys Rev. 2022; 14(6):1341-1348.

PMID: 36570321 PMC: 9759050. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-022-01032-7.


Antibody CDR amino acids underlying the functionality of antibody repertoires in recognizing diverse protein antigens.

Peng H, Hsu H, Yu C, Hung F, Tung C, Huang Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):12555.

PMID: 35869245 PMC: 9307644. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16841-9.


PlaceWaters: Real-time, explicit interface water sampling during Rosetta ligand docking.

Smith S, Shub L, Meiler J PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0269072.

PMID: 35639743 PMC: 9154094. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269072.


References
1.
Cappel D, Wahlstrom R, Brenk R, Sotriffer C . Probing the dynamic nature of water molecules and their influences on ligand binding in a model binding site. J Chem Inf Model. 2011; 51(10):2581-94. DOI: 10.1021/ci200052j. View

2.
Ross G, Morris G, Biggin P . Rapid and accurate prediction and scoring of water molecules in protein binding sites. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32036. PMC: 3291545. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032036. View

3.
Wade R, Clark K, Goodford P . Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 1. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form two hydrogen bonds. J Med Chem. 1993; 36(1):140-7. DOI: 10.1021/jm00053a018. View

4.
Bui H, Schiewe A, Haworth I . WATGEN: an algorithm for modeling water networks at protein-protein interfaces. J Comput Chem. 2007; 28(14):2241-51. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20751. View

5.
Janin J . Wet and dry interfaces: the role of solvent in protein-protein and protein-DNA recognition. Structure. 2000; 7(12):R277-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)88333-1. View