» Articles » PMID: 24153188

Structure of the SecY Channel During Initiation of Protein Translocation

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2013 Oct 25
PMID 24153188
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many secretory proteins are targeted by signal sequences to a protein-conducting channel, formed by prokaryotic SecY or eukaryotic Sec61 complexes, and are translocated across the membrane during their synthesis. Crystal structures of the inactive channel show that the SecY subunit of the heterotrimeric complex consists of two halves that form an hourglass-shaped pore with a constriction in the middle of the membrane and a lateral gate that faces the lipid phase. The closed channel has an empty cytoplasmic funnel and an extracellular funnel that is filled with a small helical domain, called the plug. During initiation of translocation, a ribosome-nascent chain complex binds to the SecY (or Sec61) complex, resulting in insertion of the nascent chain. However, the mechanism of channel opening during translocation is unclear. Here we have addressed this question by determining structures of inactive and active ribosome-channel complexes with cryo-electron microscopy. Non-translating ribosome-SecY channel complexes derived from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii or Escherichia coli show the channel in its closed state, and indicate that ribosome binding per se causes only minor changes. The structure of an active E. coli ribosome-channel complex demonstrates that the nascent chain opens the channel, causing mostly rigid body movements of the amino- and carboxy-terminal halves of SecY. In this early translocation intermediate, the polypeptide inserts as a loop into the SecY channel with the hydrophobic signal sequence intercalated into the open lateral gate. The nascent chain also forms a loop on the cytoplasmic surface of SecY rather than entering the channel directly.

Citing Articles

The Role of Protein-Lipid Interactions in Priming the Bacterial Translocon.

Sinclair M, Tajkhorshid E Membranes (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39728699 PMC: 11677795. DOI: 10.3390/membranes14120249.


Steric trapping strategy for studying the folding of helical membrane proteins.

Yao J, Hong H Methods. 2024; 225:1-12.

PMID: 38428472 PMC: 11107808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.02.007.


Dynamic coupling of fast channel gating with slow ATP-turnover underpins protein transport through the Sec translocon.

Crossley J, Allen W, Watkins D, Sabir T, Radford S, Tuma R EMBO J. 2024; 43(1):1-13.

PMID: 38177311 PMC: 10883268. DOI: 10.1038/s44318-023-00004-1.


A common mechanism of Sec61 translocon inhibition by small molecules.

Itskanov S, Wang L, Junne T, Sherriff R, Xiao L, Blanchard N Nat Chem Biol. 2023; 19(9):1063-1071.

PMID: 37169959 PMC: 11458068. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-023-01337-y.


Exploring the Structural Variability of Dynamic Biological Complexes by Single-Particle Cryo-Electron Microscopy.

DiIorio M, Kulczyk A Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(1).

PMID: 36677177 PMC: 9866264. DOI: 10.3390/mi14010118.


References
1.
Cannon K, Or E, Clemons Jr W, Shibata Y, Rapoport T . Disulfide bridge formation between SecY and a translocating polypeptide localizes the translocation pore to the center of SecY. J Cell Biol. 2005; 169(2):219-25. PMC: 2171872. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200412019. View

2.
Plath K, Mothes W, Wilkinson B, Stirling C, Rapoport T . Signal sequence recognition in posttranslational protein transport across the yeast ER membrane. Cell. 1998; 94(6):795-807. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81738-9. View

3.
Park E, Rapoport T . Mechanisms of Sec61/SecY-mediated protein translocation across membranes. Annu Rev Biophys. 2012; 41:21-40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102312. View

4.
Shao S, Hegde R . Membrane protein insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011; 27:25-56. PMC: 4163802. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154125. View

5.
Phillips J, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E . Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005; 26(16):1781-802. PMC: 2486339. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20289. View