» Articles » PMID: 24058229

Using E-Z Reader to Examine the Concurrent Development of Eye-movement Control and Reading Skill

Overview
Journal Dev Rev
Date 2013 Sep 24
PMID 24058229
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Compared to skilled adult readers, children typically make more fixations that are longer in duration, shorter saccades, and more regressions, thus reading more slowly (Blythe & Joseph, 2011). Recent attempts to understand the reasons for these differences have discovered some similarities (e.g., children and adults target their saccades similarly; Joseph, Liversedge, Blythe, White, & Rayner, 2009) and some differences (e.g., children's fixation durations are more affected by lexical variables; Blythe, Liversedge, Joseph, White, & Rayner, 2009) that have yet to be explained. In this article, the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading (Reichle, 2011; Reichle, Pollatsek, Fisher, & Rayner, 1998) is used to simulate various eye-movement phenomena in adults vs. children in order to evaluate hypotheses about the concurrent development of reading skill and eye-movement behavior. These simulations suggest that the primary difference between children and adults is their rate of lexical processing, and that different rates of (post-lexical) language processing may also contribute to some phenomena (e.g., children's slower detection of semantic anomalies; Joseph et al., 2008). The theoretical implications of this hypothesis are discussed, including possible alternative accounts of these developmental changes, how reading skill and eye movements change across the entire lifespan (e.g., college-aged vs. older readers), and individual differences in reading ability.

Citing Articles

Parafoveal Processing and Transposed-Letter Effects in Developmental Dyslexic Reading.

Kirkby J, Barrington R, Drieghe D, Liversedge S Dyslexia. 2024; 31(1):e1791.

PMID: 39627982 PMC: 11615263. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1791.


Examining gaze behavior in undergraduate students and educators during the evaluation of tooth preparation: an eye-tracking study.

Silvestri F, Odisho N, Kumar A, Grigoriadis A BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1030.

PMID: 39300488 PMC: 11414055. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06019-4.


Visuospatial, oculomotor, and executive reading skills evolve in elementary school, and errors are significant: a topological RAN study.

Lecce M, Miazza D, Muzio C, Parigi M, Miazza A, Bergomi M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1383969.

PMID: 38903458 PMC: 11188999. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1383969.


Eye Movements during Reading and their Relationship to Reading Assessment Outcomes in Swedish Elementary School Children.

Strandberg A, Nilsson M, Ostberg P, Oqvist Seimyr G J Eye Mov Res. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 37229424 PMC: 10205180. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.15.4.3.


Semantic plausibility preferentially affects the semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading: evidence from an eye-movement study.

Zhang L, Liu Z, Zhao S, Wang J PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15291.

PMID: 37159829 PMC: 10163867. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15291.


References
1.
Reichle E, Pollatsek A, Fisher D, Rayner K . Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychol Rev. 1998; 105(1):125-57. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125. View

2.
Seymour P, Aro M, Erskine J . Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. Br J Psychol. 2003; 94(Pt 2):143-74. DOI: 10.1348/000712603321661859. View

3.
Rayner K, Reichle E, Stroud M, Williams C, Pollatsek A . The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychol Aging. 2006; 21(3):448-65. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448. View

4.
Salman M, Sharpe J, Eizenman M, Lillakas L, Westall C, To T . Saccades in children. Vision Res. 2005; 46(8-9):1432-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.011. View

5.
Henderson J, Ferreira F . Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990; 16(3):417-29. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.3.417. View