Gazepath: An Eye-tracking Analysis Tool That Accounts for Individual Differences and Data Quality

Overview

Journal Behav Res Methods

Publisher Springer

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2017 Jun 9

PMID 28593606

Citations 18

Authors

Daan R van Renswoude

Maartje E J Raijmakers

Arnout Koornneef

Scott P Johnson

Sabine Hunnius

Ingmar Visser

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Eye-trackers are a popular tool for studying cognitive, emotional, and attentional processes in different populations (e.g., clinical and typically developing) and participants of all ages, ranging from infants to the elderly. This broad range of processes and populations implies that there are many inter- and intra-individual differences that need to be taken into account when analyzing eye-tracking data. Standard parsing algorithms supplied by the eye-tracker manufacturers are typically optimized for adults and do not account for these individual differences. This paper presents gazepath, an easy-to-use R-package that comes with a graphical user interface (GUI) implemented in Shiny (RStudio Inc 2015). The gazepath R-package combines solutions from the adult and infant literature to provide an eye-tracking parsing method that accounts for individual differences and differences in data quality. We illustrate the usefulness of gazepath with three examples of different data sets. The first example shows how gazepath performs on free-viewing data of infants and adults, compared to standard EyeLink parsing. We show that gazepath controls for spurious correlations between fixation durations and data quality in infant data. The second example shows that gazepath performs well in high-quality reading data of adults. The third and last example shows that gazepath can also be used on noisy infant data collected with a Tobii eye-tracker and low (60 Hz) sampling rate.

Citing Articles

Dissociable genetic influences on eye movements during abstract versus naturalistic social scene viewing in infancy.

Portugal A, Taylor M, Tammimies K, Ronald A, Falck-Ytter T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4100.

PMID: 39900629 PMC: 11791049. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83557-3.

The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.

Niehorster D, Nystrom M, Hessels R, Andersson R, Benjamins J, Hansen D Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):46.

PMID: 39762687 PMC: 11703944. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.

Identification of Language-Induced Mental Load from Eye Behaviors in Virtual Reality.

Schirm J, Gomez-Vargas A, Perusquia-Hernandez M, Skarbez R, Isoyama N, Uchiyama H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(15).

PMID: 37571449 PMC: 10422404. DOI: 10.3390/s23156667.

The Development of Relational Reasoning: An Eyetracking Analysis of Strategy Use and Adaptation in Children and Adults Performing Matrix Completion.

Niebaum J, Munakata Y Open Mind (Camb). 2023; 7:197-220.

PMID: 37416068 PMC: 10320822. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00078.

A functional model for studying common trends across trial time in eye tracking experiments.

Dong M, Telesca D, Sugar C, Shic F, Naples A, Johnson S Stat Biosci. 2023; 15(1):261-287.

PMID: 37077750 PMC: 10112660. DOI: 10.1007/s12561-022-09354-6.

References

Hutzler F, Wimmer H . Eye movements of dyslexic children when reading in a regular orthography. Brain Lang. 2004; 89(1):235-42. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00401-2. View

Koornneef A, Dotlacil J, van den Broek P, Sanders T . The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015; 69(3):455-81. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1055282. View

Wass S, Jones E, Gliga T, Smith T, Charman T, Johnson M . Shorter spontaneous fixation durations in infants with later emerging autism. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:8284. PMC: 4319149. DOI: 10.1038/srep08284. View

Andersson R, Larsson L, Holmqvist K, Stridh M, Nystrom M . One algorithm to rule them all? An evaluation and discussion of ten eye movement event-detection algorithms. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 49(2):616-637. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0738-9. View

Rayner K, Castelhano M, Yang J . Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychol Aging. 2009; 24(3):755-60. DOI: 10.1037/a0014300. View

Matin E . Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychol Bull. 1974; 81(12):899-917. DOI: 10.1037/h0037368. View

Blignaut P . Fixation identification: the optimum threshold for a dispersion algorithm. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009; 71(4):881-95. DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.4.881. View

Henderson J . Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(11):498-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006. View

van der Lans R, Wedel M, Pieters R . Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: the Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43(1):239-57. PMC: 3048294. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-010-0031-2. View

10.

Saez De Urabain I, Johnson M, Smith T . GraFIX: a semiautomatic approach for parsing low- and high-quality eye-tracking data. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 47(1):53-72. PMC: 4333362. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0456-0. View

11.

Rayner K, Reichle E, Stroud M, Williams C, Pollatsek A . The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychol Aging. 2006; 21(3):448-65. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448. View

12.

Helo A, Pannasch S, Sirri L, Rama P . The maturation of eye movement behavior: scene viewing characteristics in children and adults. Vision Res. 2014; 103:83-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.006. View

13.

Mould M, Foster D, Amano K, Oakley J . A simple nonparametric method for classifying eye fixations. Vision Res. 2012; 57:18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.12.006. View

14.

Van Renswoude D, Johnson S, Raijmakers M, Visser I . Do infants have the horizontal bias?. Infant Behav Dev. 2016; 44:38-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.05.005. View

15.

Karatekin C, Asarnow R . Exploratory eye movements to pictures in childhood-onset schizophrenia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999; 27(1):35-49. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022662323823. View

16.

Riby D, Hancock P . Viewing it differently: social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 46(11):2855-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.003. View

17.

Reichle E, Liversedge S, Drieghe D, Blythe H, Joseph H, White S . Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. Dev Rev. 2013; 33(2):110-149. PMC: 3774954. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.03.001. View

18.

Gredeback G, Johnson S, von Hofsten C . Eye tracking in infancy research. Dev Neuropsychol. 2010; 35(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1080/87565640903325758. View

19.

Wass S, Smith T, Johnson M . Parsing eye-tracking data of variable quality to provide accurate fixation duration estimates in infants and adults. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 45(1):229-50. PMC: 3578727. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0245-6. View

20.

Rayner K, Schotter E, Masson M, Potter M, Treiman R . So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help?. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016; 17(1):4-34. DOI: 10.1177/1529100615623267. View