» Articles » PMID: 33586535

Online Inference Making and Comprehension Monitoring in Children During Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2021 Feb 15
PMID 33586535
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inference generation and comprehension monitoring are essential elements of successful reading comprehension. While both improve with age and reading development, little is known about when and how children make inferences and monitor their comprehension during the reading process itself. Over two experiments, we monitored the eye movements of two groups of children (age 8-13 years) as they read short passages and answered questions that tapped local (Experiment 1) and global (Experiment 2) inferences. To tap comprehension monitoring, the passages contained target words which were consistent or inconsistent with the context. Comprehension question location was also manipulated with the question appearing before or after the passage. Children made local inferences during reading, but the evidence was less clear for global inferences. Children were sensitive to inconsistencies that relied on the generation of an inference, consistent with successful comprehension monitoring, although this was seen only very late in the eye movement record. Although question location had a large effect on reading times, it had no effect on global comprehension in one experiment and reading the question first had a detrimental effect in the other. We conclude that children appear to prioritise efficiency over completeness when reading, generating inferences spontaneously only when they are necessary for establishing a coherent representation of the text.

References
1.
Connor C, Radach R, Vorstius C, Day S, McLean L, Morrison F . Individual differences in fifth graders' reading and language predict their comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study. Sci Stud Read. 2016; 19(2):114-134. PMC: 4824948. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2014.943905. View

2.
Duffy S, Rayner K . Eye movements and anaphor resolution: effects of antecedent typicality and distance. Lang Speech. 1990; 33 ( Pt 2):103-19. DOI: 10.1177/002383099003300201. View

3.
OBrien E, Shank D, Myers J, Rayner K . Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988; 14(3):410-20. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.410. View

4.
Cain K, Oakhill J, Barnes M, Bryant P . Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Mem Cognit. 2001; 29(6):850-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196414. View

5.
Yang C, Perfetti C, Schmalhofer F . Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):55-89. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.55. View