» Articles » PMID: 23809685

Accuracy of Noninvasive Hemoglobin and Invasive Point-of-care Hemoglobin Testing Compared with a Laboratory Analyzer

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23809685
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Hemoglobin concentration is assessed to detect anemia and its associated morbidities. Hemoglobin is usually determined from venous or capillary blood samples run on a laboratory analyzer. However, this method requires a needle stick and results can be delayed. It also exposes caregivers to risks associated with needle sticks and blood exposure. Noninvasive hemoglobin determination would be of benefit to patients and caregivers because it would allow for quick and painless point-of-care assessment.

Methods: Hemoglobin determination from a noninvasive spot check hemoglobin device (Pronto-7 with SpHb, Masimo) and an invasive point-of-care device (HemoCue) was compared with venous blood samples run on a laboratory hematology analyzer.

Results: A total of 440 outpatients and healthy volunteers were included (mean age 36 years, 62% female). Compared with the hematology analyzer, the bias ± standard deviation of was -0.1 ± 1.1 g/dL for SpHb and -0.1 ± 1.6 g/dL for HemoCue.

Conclusion: Noninvasive hemoglobin testing with SpHb provided similar accuracy as invasive point-of-care hemoglobin testing and may enable more efficient and effective patient care.

Citing Articles

Association of Anaesthetists guidelines: the use of blood components and their alternatives.

Shah A, Klein A, Agarwal S, Lindley A, Ahmed A, Dowling K Anaesthesia. 2025; 80(4):425-447.

PMID: 39781579 PMC: 11885198. DOI: 10.1111/anae.16542.


Dataset of human skin and fingernails images for non-invasive haemoglobin level assessment.

Yakimov B, Buiankin K, Denisenko G, Bardadin I, Pavlov O, Shitova Y Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1070.

PMID: 39358394 PMC: 11447208. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03895-9.


Investigation on the influence of the skin tone on hyperspectral imaging for free flap surgery.

Pachyn E, Aumiller M, Freymuller C, Linek M, Volgger V, Buchner A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13979.

PMID: 38886457 PMC: 11183063. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64549-9.


Performance of the non-invasive point-of-care device, EzeCheck, for haemoglobin assessment in adults and children in community and institutional care settings.

Das Mahapatra P, Roy C, Agarwal K, Banerjee J, Sharma S PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(5):e0000500.

PMID: 38717987 PMC: 11078411. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000500.


Noninvasive hemoglobin quantification across different cohorts using a wearable diffuse reflectance spectroscopy system.

Chen Y, Lai G, Chen C, Cheng H, Tseng S Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(3):1739-1749.

PMID: 38495710 PMC: 10942696. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.517645.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Berkow L . Factors affecting hemoglobin measurement. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013; 27(5):499-508. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9456-3. View

3.
Gehring H, Duembgen L, Peterlein M, Hagelberg S, Dibbelt L . Hemoximetry as the "gold standard"? Error assessment based on differences among identical blood gas analyzer devices of five manufacturers. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105(6 Suppl):S24-S30. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268713.58174.cc. View

4.
Lamhaut L, Apriotesei R, Combes X, Lejay M, Carli P, Vivien B . Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue® with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115(3):548-54. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182270c22. View

5.
Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Catherine K, Levrat Q, Debaene B, Mimoz O . Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39(10):2277-82. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182227e2d. View