» Articles » PMID: 23804615

Mapping the Navigational Knowledge of Individually Foraging Ants, Myrmecia Croslandi

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Jun 28
PMID 23804615
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ants are efficient navigators, guided by path integration and visual landmarks. Path integration is the primary strategy in landmark-poor habitats, but landmarks are readily used when available. The landmark panorama provides reliable information about heading direction, routes and specific location. Visual memories for guidance are often acquired along routes or near to significant places. Over what area can such locally acquired memories provide information for reaching a place? This question is unusually approachable in the solitary foraging Australian jack jumper ant, since individual foragers typically travel to one or two nest-specific foraging trees. We find that within 10 m from the nest, ants both with and without home vector information available from path integration return directly to the nest from all compass directions, after briefly scanning the panorama. By reconstructing panoramic views within the successful homing range, we show that in the open woodland habitat of these ants, snapshot memories acquired close to the nest provide sufficient navigational information to determine nest-directed heading direction over a surprisingly large area, including areas that animals may have not visited previously.

Citing Articles

Coming home: how visually navigating ants (Myrmecia spp.) pinpoint their nest.

Zeil J J Exp Biol. 2025; 228(2).

PMID: 39866147 PMC: 11832129. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.249499.


butterflies use wide-field landscape features, but not individual local landmarks, during spatial learning.

Moura P, Cardoso M, Montgomery S R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(11):241097.

PMID: 39507999 PMC: 11539145. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241097.


Transcriptomic Signature of Spatial Navigation in Brains of Desert Ants.

Jaimes-Nino L, Bar A, Subach A, Stoldt M, Libbrecht R, Scharf I Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70365.

PMID: 39371266 PMC: 11449808. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70365.


Walk this way: modeling foraging ant dynamics in multiple food source environments.

Hartman S, Ryan S, Karamched B J Math Biol. 2024; 89(4):41.

PMID: 39266783 PMC: 11392994. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-024-02136-2.


Monarch butterflies memorize the spatial location of a food source.

Konnerth M, J Foster J, El Jundi B, Spaethe J, Beetz M Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2013):20231574.

PMID: 38113939 PMC: 10730289. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1574.


References
1.
Graham P, Philippides A, Baddeley B . Animal cognition: multi-modal interactions in ant learning. Curr Biol. 2010; 20(15):R639-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.018. View

2.
Graham P, Cheng K . Ants use the panoramic skyline as a visual cue during navigation. Curr Biol. 2009; 19(20):R935-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.015. View

3.
Narendra A, Reid S, Greiner B, Peters R, Hemmi J, Ribi W . Caste-specific visual adaptations to distinct daily activity schedules in Australian Myrmecia ants. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1709):1141-9. PMC: 3049064. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1378. View

4.
Narendra A . Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. I. Proportional path-integration takes the ant half-way home. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210(Pt 10):1798-803. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02768. View

5.
Wehner R, Menzel R . Do insects have cognitive maps?. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990; 13:403-14. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.002155. View