» Articles » PMID: 37993707

Trail Using Ants Follow Idiosyncratic Routes in Complex Landscapes

Overview
Journal Learn Behav
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Nov 22
PMID 37993707
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A large volume of research on individually navigating ants has shown how path integration and visually guided navigation form a major part of the ant navigation toolkit for many species and are sufficient mechanisms for successful navigation. One of the behavioural markers of the interaction of these mechanisms is that experienced foragers develop idiosyncratic routes that require that individual ants have personal and unique visual memories that they use to guide habitual routes between the nest and feeding sites. The majority of ants, however, inhabit complex cluttered environments and social pheromone trails are often part of the collective recruitment, organisation and navigation of these foragers. We do not know how individual navigation interacts with collective behaviour along shared trails in complex natural environments. We thus asked here if wood ants that forage through densely cluttered woodlands where they travel along shared trails repeatedly follow the same routes or if they choose a spread of paths within the shared trail. We recorded three long homing trajectories of 20 individual wood ants in their natural woodland habitat. We found that wood ants follow idiosyncratic routes when navigating along shared trails through highly complex visual landscapes. This shows that ants rely on individual memories for habitual route guidance even in cluttered environments when chemical trail information is available. We argue that visual cues are likely to be the dominant sensory modality for the idiosyncratic routes. These experiments shed new light on how ants, or insects in general, navigate through complex multimodal environments.

Citing Articles

How a salt pan ant Cataglyphis fortis navigates artificially complex environments.

Freire M, Oberweiser M, Bollig A, Kunert G, Knaden M J Exp Biol. 2025; 228(4).

PMID: 39976164 PMC: 11883240. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.249369.

References
1.
Buehlmann C, Aussel A, Graham P . Dynamic multimodal interactions in navigating wood ants: what do path details tell us about cue integration?. J Exp Biol. 2020; 223(Pt 7). DOI: 10.1242/jeb.221036. View

2.
Macquart D, Garnier L, Combe M, Beugnon G . Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005; 192(3):221-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-005-0064-7. View

3.
Buehlmann C, Woodgate J, Collett T . On the Encoding of Panoramic Visual Scenes in Navigating Wood Ants. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(15):2022-2027. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.005. View

4.
Narendra A, Gourmaud S, Zeil J . Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi. Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1765):20130683. PMC: 3712440. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0683. View

5.
Zeil J, Hofmann M, Chahl J . Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003; 20(3):450-69. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.000450. View