» Articles » PMID: 38052764

Effect of Repetition of Vertical and Horizontal Routes on Navigation Performance in Australian Bull Ants

Overview
Journal Learn Behav
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Dec 5
PMID 38052764
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Solitarily foraging ant species differ in their reliance on their two primary navigational systems- path integration and visual learning. Despite many species of Australian bull ants spending most of their foraging time on their foraging tree, little is known about the use of these systems while climbing. "Rewinding" displacements are commonly used to understand navigational system usage, and work by introducing a mismatch between these navigational systems, by displacing foragers after they have run-down their path integration vector. We used rewinding to test the role of path integration on the arboreal and terrestrial navigation of M. midas. We rewound foragers along either the vertical portion, the ground surface portion, or across both portions of their homing trip. Since rewinding involves repeatedly capturing and releasing foragers, we included a nondisplacement, capture-and-release control, in which the path integration vector is unchanged. We found that rewound foragers do not seem to accumulate path integration vector, although a limited effect of vertical rewinding was found, suggesting a potential higher sensitivity while descending the foraging tree. However, the decrease in navigational efficiency due to capture was larger than the vertical rewinding effect, which along with the negative impact of the vertical surface, and an interaction between capture and rewinding, may suggest aversion rather than path integration caused the vertical rewinding response. Together these results add to the evidence that M. midas makes minimal use of path integration while foraging, and the growing evidence that they are capable of quickly learning from aversive stimulus.

Citing Articles

Desert ants (Melophorus bagoti) oscillate and scan more in navigation when the visual scene changes.

Deeti S, Cheng K Anim Cogn. 2025; 28(1):15.

PMID: 39979462 PMC: 11842525. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-025-01936-3.

References
1.
Andel D, Wehner R . Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis: how to make a homing ant run away from home. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1547):1485-9. PMC: 1691744. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2749. View

2.
Flores-Abreu I, Hurly T, Ainge J, Healy S . Three-dimensional space: locomotory style explains memory differences in rats and hummingbirds. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1784):20140301. PMC: 4043095. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0301. View

3.
Wystrach A, Mangan M, Webb B . Optimal cue integration in ants. Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1816):20151484. PMC: 4614770. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1484. View

4.
Collett M . How navigational guidance systems are combined in a desert ant. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(10):927-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.049. View

5.
Warrant E, Dacke M . Vision and visual navigation in nocturnal insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010; 56:239-54. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144852. View