» Articles » PMID: 23209744

Ant Navigation: Fractional Use of the Home Vector

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Dec 5
PMID 23209744
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Home is a special location for many animals, offering shelter from the elements, protection from predation, and a common place for gathering of the same species. Not surprisingly, many species have evolved efficient, robust homing strategies, which are used as part of each and every foraging journey. A basic strategy used by most animals is to take the shortest possible route home by accruing the net distances and directions travelled during foraging, a strategy well known as path integration. This strategy is part of the navigation toolbox of ants occupying different landscapes. However, when there is a visual discrepancy between test and training conditions, the distance travelled by animals relying on the path integrator varies dramatically between species: from 90% of the home vector to an absolute distance of only 50 cm. We here ask what the theoretically optimal balance between PI-driven and landmark-driven navigation should be. In combination with well-established results from optimal search theory, we show analytically that this fractional use of the home vector is an optimal homing strategy under a variety of circumstances. Assuming there is a familiar route that an ant recognizes, theoretically optimal search should always begin at some fraction of the home vector, depending on the region of familiarity. These results are shown to be largely independent of the search algorithm used. Ant species from different habitats appear to have optimized their navigation strategy based on the availability and nature of navigational information content in their environment.

Citing Articles

Route retracing: way pointing and multiple vector memories in trail-following ants.

Freas C, Spetch M J Exp Biol. 2023; 227(2).

PMID: 38126715 PMC: 10906666. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246695.


Visual navigation: properties, acquisition and use of views.

Zeil J J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2022; 209(4):499-514.

PMID: 36515743 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01599-2.


Homing in the arachnid taxa Araneae and Amblypygi.

Ortega-Escobar J Anim Cogn. 2020; 23(6):1189-1204.

PMID: 32894371 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01424-w.


Spatial cognition in the context of foraging styles and information transfer in ants.

Reznikova Z Anim Cogn. 2020; 23(6):1143-1159.

PMID: 32840698 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01423-x.


Multimodal interactions in insect navigation.

Buehlmann C, Mangan M, Graham P Anim Cogn. 2020; 23(6):1129-1141.

PMID: 32323027 PMC: 7700066. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01383-2.


References
1.
Collett M, Collett T . How do insects use path integration for their navigation?. Biol Cybern. 2000; 83(3):245-59. DOI: 10.1007/s004220000168. View

2.
Cheng K, Middleton E, Wehner R . Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants of the same species inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments. J Exp Biol. 2012; 215(Pt 18):3169-74. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.070417. View

3.
Narendra A . Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. I. Proportional path-integration takes the ant half-way home. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210(Pt 10):1798-803. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02768. View

4.
Muller M, Wehner R . Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85(14):5287-90. PMC: 281735. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5287. View

5.
Reynolds A, Rhodes C . The Lévy flight paradigm: random search patterns and mechanisms. Ecology. 2009; 90(4):877-87. DOI: 10.1890/08-0153.1. View