Signaling to Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase from ErbB1 Kinase and Protein Kinase C: Feedback, Heterogeneity, and Gating

Overview

Journal J Biol Chem

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2013 Jun 12

PMID 23754287

Citations 10

Authors

Rebecca M Perrett

Robert C Fowkes

Christopher J Caunt

Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova

Clive G Bowsher

Craig A McArdle

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Many extracellular signals act via the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade in which kinetics, cell-cell variability, and sensitivity of the ERK response can all influence cell fate. Here we used automated microscopy to explore the effects of ERK-mediated negative feedback on these attributes in cells expressing endogenous ERK or ERK2-GFP reporters. We studied acute rather than chronic stimulation with either epidermal growth factor (ErbB1 activation) or phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PKC activation). In unstimulated cells, ERK-mediated negative feedback reduced the population-average and cell-cell variability of the level of activated ppERK and increased its robustness to changes in ERK expression. In stimulated cells, negative feedback (evident between 5 min and 4 h) also reduced average levels and variability of phosphorylated ERK (ppERK) without altering the "gradedness" or sensitivity of the response. Binning cells according to total ERK expression revealed, strikingly, that maximal ppERK responses initially occur at submaximal ERK levels and that this non-monotonic relationship changes to an increasing, monotonic one within 15 min. These phenomena occur in HeLa cells and MCF7 breast cancer cells and in the presence and absence of ERK-mediated negative feedback. They were best modeled assuming distributive (rather than processive) activation. Thus, we have uncovered a novel, time-dependent change in the relationship between total ERK and ppERK levels that persists without negative feedback. This change makes acute response kinetics dependent on ERK level and provides a "gating" or control mechanism in which the interplay between stimulus duration and the distribution of ERK expression across cells could modulate the proportion of cells that respond to stimulation.

Citing Articles

Exploring cyclic networks of multisite modification reveals origins of information processing characteristics.

Suwanmajo T, Ramesh V, Krishnan J Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16542.

PMID: 33024185 PMC: 7539153. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73045-9.

Signaling pathways as linear transmitters.

Nunns H, Goentoro L Elife. 2018; 7.

PMID: 30222104 PMC: 6202053. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.33617.

When More Is Less: Dual Phosphorylation Protects Signaling Off State against Overexpression.

Witzel F, Bluthgen N Biophys J. 2018; 115(7):1383-1392.

PMID: 30217381 PMC: 6170600. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.08.019.

Information Transfer via Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors to ERK and NFAT: Sensing GnRH and Sensing Dynamics.

Garner K, Voliotis M, Alobaid H, Perrett R, Pham T, Tsaneva-Atanasova K J Endocr Soc. 2017; 1(4):260-277.

PMID: 29264483 PMC: 5686700. DOI: 10.1210/js.2016-1096.

Conversion of graded phosphorylation into switch-like nuclear translocation via autoregulatory mechanisms in ERK signalling.

Shindo Y, Iwamoto K, Mouri K, Hibino K, Tomita M, Kosako H Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10485.

PMID: 26786866 PMC: 4736105. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10485.

References

Finch A, Caunt C, Perrett R, Tsaneva-Atanasova K, McArdle C . Dual specificity phosphatases 10 and 16 are positive regulators of EGF-stimulated ERK activity: indirect regulation of ERK signals by JNK/p38 selective MAPK phosphatases. Cell Signal. 2012; 24(5):1002-11. PMC: 3314959. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.12.021. View

Lin J, Harding A, Giurisato E, Shaw A . KSR1 modulates the sensitivity of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation in T cells without altering fundamental system outputs. Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 29(8):2082-91. PMC: 2663292. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01634-08. View

Ruf F, Hayot F, Park M, Ge Y, Lin G, Roysam B . Noise propagation and scaling in regulation of gonadotrope biosynthesis. Biophys J. 2007; 93(12):4474-80. PMC: 2098712. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.115170. View

Kholodenko B, Hancock J, Kolch W . Signalling ballet in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11(6):414-26. PMC: 2977972. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2901. View

Caunt C, Finch A, Sedgley K, Oakley L, Luttrell L, McArdle C . Arrestin-mediated ERK activation by gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: receptor-specific activation mechanisms and compartmentalization. J Biol Chem. 2005; 281(5):2701-10. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M507242200. View

Malleshaiah M, Shahrezaei V, Swain P, Michnick S . The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast. Nature. 2010; 465(7294):101-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature08946. View

Ohori M, Kinoshita T, Okubo M, Sato K, Yamazaki A, Arakawa H . Identification of a selective ERK inhibitor and structural determination of the inhibitor-ERK2 complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 336(1):357-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.082. View

Fujioka A, Terai K, Itoh R, Aoki K, Nakamura T, Kuroda S . Dynamics of the Ras/ERK MAPK cascade as monitored by fluorescent probes. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281(13):8917-26. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M509344200. View

Bashor C, Helman N, Yan S, Lim W . Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signaling dynamics. Science. 2008; 319(5869):1539-43. DOI: 10.1126/science.1151153. View

10.

Widmann C, Gibson S, Jarpe M, Johnson G . Mitogen-activated protein kinase: conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol Rev. 1999; 79(1):143-80. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.143. View

11.

Schoeberl B, Eichler-Jonsson C, Gilles E, Muller G . Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 20(4):370-5. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0402-370. View

12.

BURACK W, Sturgill T . The activating dual phosphorylation of MAPK by MEK is nonprocessive. Biochemistry. 1997; 36(20):5929-33. DOI: 10.1021/bi970535d. View

13.

Ory S, Zhou M, Conrads T, Veenstra T, Morrison D . Protein phosphatase 2A positively regulates Ras signaling by dephosphorylating KSR1 and Raf-1 on critical 14-3-3 binding sites. Curr Biol. 2003; 13(16):1356-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00535-9. View

14.

Aharonov A, Pruss R, Herschman H . Epidermal growth factor. Relationship between receptor regulation and mitogenesis in 3T3 cells. J Biol Chem. 1978; 253(11):3970-7. View

15.

Santos S, Verveer P, Bastiaens P . Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9(3):324-30. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1543. View

16.

Kupzig S, Walker S, Cullen P . The frequencies of calcium oscillations are optimized for efficient calcium-mediated activation of Ras and the ERK/MAPK cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(21):7577-82. PMC: 1103707. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409611102. View

17.

Birtwistle M, Rauch J, Kiyatkin A, Aksamitiene E, Dobrzynski M, Hoek J . Emergence of bimodal cell population responses from the interplay between analog single-cell signaling and protein expression noise. BMC Syst Biol. 2012; 6:109. PMC: 3484110. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-109. View

18.

Alon U . Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet. 2007; 8(6):450-61. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2102. View

19.

Ebisuya M, Kondoh K, Nishida E . The duration, magnitude and compartmentalization of ERK MAP kinase activity: mechanisms for providing signaling specificity. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118(Pt 14):2997-3002. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02505. View

20.

Armstrong S, Caunt C, Fowkes R, Tsaneva-Atanasova K, McArdle C . Pulsatile and sustained gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor signaling: does the ERK signaling pathway decode GnRH pulse frequency?. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285(32):24360-71. PMC: 2915671. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.115964. View