» Articles » PMID: 23561577

Tumor-associated Copy Number Changes in the Circulation of Patients with Prostate Cancer Identified Through Whole-genome Sequencing

Abstract

Background: Patients with prostate cancer may present with metastatic or recurrent disease despite initial curative treatment. The propensity of metastatic prostate cancer to spread to the bone has limited repeated sampling of tumor deposits. Hence, considerably less is understood about this lethal metastatic disease, as it is not commonly studied. Here we explored whole-genome sequencing of plasma DNA to scan the tumor genomes of these patients non-invasively.

Methods: We wanted to make whole-genome analysis from plasma DNA amenable to clinical routine applications and developed an approach based on a benchtop high-throughput platform, that is, Illuminas MiSeq instrument. We performed whole-genome sequencing from plasma at a shallow sequencing depth to establish a genome-wide copy number profile of the tumor at low costs within 2 days. In parallel, we sequenced a panel of 55 high-interest genes and 38 introns with frequent fusion breakpoints such as the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion with high coverage. After intensive testing of our approach with samples from 25 individuals without cancer we analyzed 13 plasma samples derived from five patients with castration resistant (CRPC) and four patients with castration sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC).

Results: The genome-wide profiling in the plasma of our patients revealed multiple copy number aberrations including those previously reported in prostate tumors, such as losses in 8p and gains in 8q. High-level copy number gains in the AR locus were observed in patients with CRPC but not with CSPC disease. We identified the TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement associated 3-Mbp deletion on chromosome 21 and found corresponding fusion plasma fragments in these cases. In an index case multiregional sequencing of the primary tumor identified different copy number changes in each sector, suggesting multifocal disease. Our plasma analyses of this index case, performed 13 years after resection of the primary tumor, revealed novel chromosomal rearrangements, which were stable in serial plasma analyses over a 9-month period, which is consistent with the presence of one metastatic clone.

Conclusions: The genomic landscape of prostate cancer can be established by non-invasive means from plasma DNA. Our approach provides specific genomic signatures within 2 days which may therefore serve as 'liquid biopsy'.

Citing Articles

Genomic and fragmentomic landscapes of cell-free DNA for early cancer detection.

Bruhm D, Vulpescu N, Foda Z, Phallen J, Scharpf R, Velculescu V Nat Rev Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 40038442 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-025-00795-x.


A perspective review on the systematic implementation of ctDNA in phase I clinical trial drug development.

Guigal-Stephan N, Lockhart B, Moser T, Heitzer E J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025; 44(1):79.

PMID: 40022112 PMC: 11871688. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-025-03328-4.


Expanded knowledge of cell-free DNA biology: potential to broaden the clinical utility.

Che H, Stanley K, Jatsenko T, Thienpont B, Vermeesch J Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2024; 3(3):216-234.

PMID: 39697489 PMC: 11648412. DOI: 10.20517/evcna.2022.21.


Advancement in Multi-omics approaches for Uterine Sarcoma.

Wang W, Hu Y, Fu F, Ren W, Wang T, Wang S Biomark Res. 2024; 12(1):129.

PMID: 39472980 PMC: 11523907. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00673-y.


Latest Research Progress of Liquid Biopsy in Tumor-A Narrative Review.

Jiang H Cancer Manag Res. 2024; 16:1031-1042.

PMID: 39165347 PMC: 11335005. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S479338.


References
1.
de Bono J, Scher H, Montgomery R, Parker C, Miller M, Tissing H . Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(19):6302-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0872. View

2.
Diehl F, Li M, Dressman D, He Y, Shen D, Szabo S . Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(45):16368-73. PMC: 1283450. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507904102. View

3.
Hupe P, Stransky N, Thiery J, Radvanyi F, Barillot E . Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(18):3413-22. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth418. View

4.
Visakorpi T, Hyytinen E, Koivisto P, Tanner M, Keinanen R, Palmberg C . In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 1995; 9(4):401-6. DOI: 10.1038/ng0495-401. View

5.
Lim J, Ghadessy F, Abdullah A, Pinsky L, Trifiro M, Yong E . Human androgen receptor mutation disrupts ternary interactions between ligand, receptor domains, and the coactivator TIF2 (transcription intermediary factor 2). Mol Endocrinol. 2000; 14(8):1187-97. DOI: 10.1210/mend.14.8.0499. View