Risk-based Prostate Cancer Screening: Who and How?
Overview
Affiliations
The purpose of this review is to identify clinical risk factors for prostate cancer and to assess the utility and limitations of our current tools for prostate cancer screening. Prostate-specific antigen is the single most important factor for identifying men at increased risk of prostate cancer but is best assessed in the context of other clinical factors; increasing age, race, and family history are well-established risk factors for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. In addition to clinical risk calculators, novel tools such as multiparametric imaging, serum or urinary biomarkers, and genetic profiling show promise in improving prostate cancer diagnosis and characterization. Optimal use of existing and future tools will help alleviate the problems of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer without reversing the substantial mortality declines that have been achieved in the screening era.
Vaidya A, Shankardass A, Buford M, Hall R, Qiao P, Wang H Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024; 2(8):560-568.
PMID: 39211789 PMC: 11351422. DOI: 10.1021/cbmi.4c00002.
Angel C, Iguacel I, Mullee A, Guha N, Wasson R, McKenna D Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019; 23(1):11-23.
PMID: 31147627 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0154-1.
The RNA-binding protein FXR1 modulates prostate cancer progression by regulating FBXO4.
Cao H, Gao R, Yu C, Chen L, Feng Y Funct Integr Genomics. 2019; 19(3):487-496.
PMID: 30746571 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-019-00661-8.
Mitochondrial functions and melatonin: a tour of the reproductive cancers.
de Almeida Chuffa L, Seiva F, Cucielo M, Silveira H, Reiter R, Lupi L Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018; 76(5):837-863.
PMID: 30430198 PMC: 11105419. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-018-2963-0.
Ayat N, Qin J, Cheng H, Roelle S, Gao S, Li Y ACS Med Chem Lett. 2018; 9(7):730-735.
PMID: 30034609 PMC: 6047029. DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00172.