» Articles » PMID: 19733959

A Risk-based Strategy Improves Prostate-specific Antigen-driven Detection of Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Sep 8
PMID 19733959
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Screening for prostate cancer (PC) is controversial due to uncertainties about its efficiency.

Objective: We aimed to develop strategies to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies while still detecting most clinically important PC cases.

Design, Setting, And Participants: In 1850 men initially screened and biopsied (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] value > or =3.0 ng/ml) in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, we calculated both the probability of having a positive lateralized sextant biopsy [P(biop+)] and the probability of having an indolent cancer [P(ind)] if PC was detected at biopsy (n=541). Analyses of repeat screening included 225 cancers in 1201 men.

Interventions: The P(biop+) was based on applying a logistic regression model that included ultrasound volume, digital rectal exam, and transrectal ultrasound in addition to the PSA value. The P(ind) was based on a recently validated nomogram. MEASUREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS: At initial screening the fraction of positive biopsies was 29% (541 of 1850). Applying an additional P(biop+) cut-off of 12.5% implied that 613 of the 1850 men (33%) would not have been biopsied. This would result in an increase in the positive predictive value (PPV) to 38% (468 of 1237). At repeat screening a similar P(biop+) cut-off would result in an increase in the PPV from 19% (225 of 1201) to 25% (188 of 760). Thirteen percent of PC cases would not have been diagnosed, of which 70% (initial screening) and 81% (repeat screening) could be considered as potentially indolent. None of the deadly PC cases would have been missed. A PSA cut-off of > or =4.0 ng/ml resulted in similar numbers of biopsied cases saved but considerably higher numbers of missed diagnoses.

Conclusions: An individualized screening algorithm using other available prebiopsy information in addition to PSA level can result in a considerable reduction of unnecessary biopsies. Very few important PC cases, for which diagnosis at a subsequent screening visit might be too late for treatment with curative intent, would be missed.

Citing Articles

Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.

Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.

PMID: 39886507 PMC: 11203092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.


The Capio Prostate Cancer Center Model for Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Real-world Evidence from 2018 to 2022.

Palsdottir T, Soderback H, Jaderling F, Bergman M, Vigneswaran H, Gronberg H Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 61:29-36.

PMID: 38384438 PMC: 10879938. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.012.


Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.

Krauss W, Frey J, Heydorn Lagerlof J, Liden M, Thunberg P Acta Radiol. 2023; 65(3):307-317.

PMID: 38115809 PMC: 10964389. DOI: 10.1177/02841851231216555.


Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer based on multimodal data: a multicenter study.

Zhang H, Ji J, Liu Z, Lu H, Qian C, Wei C BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):270.

PMID: 37488510 PMC: 10367399. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02964-x.


Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Morote J, Borque-Fernando A, Triquell M, Campistol M, Servian P, Abascal J Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023; 53:46-54.

PMID: 37441350 PMC: 10334241. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.013.