» Articles » PMID: 18027095

Quantifying the Role of PSA Screening in the US Prostate Cancer Mortality Decline

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Public Health
Date 2007 Nov 21
PMID 18027095
Citations 150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To quantify the plausible contribution of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening to the nearly 30% decline in the US prostate cancer mortality rate observed during the 1990s.

Methods: Two mathematical modeling teams of the US National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network independently projected disease mortality in the absence and presence of PSA screening. Both teams relied on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data for disease incidence, used common estimates of PSA screening rates, and assumed that screening, by shifting disease from distant to local-regional clinical stage, confers a corresponding improvement in disease-specific survival.

Results: The teams projected similar mortality increases in the absence of screening and decreases in the presence of screening after 1985. By 2000, the models projected that 45% (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) to 70% (University of Michigan) of the observed decline in prostate cancer mortality could be plausibly attributed to the stage shift induced by screening.

Conclusions: PSA screening may account for much, but not all, of the observed drop in prostate cancer mortality. Other factors, such as changing treatment practices, may also have played a role in improving prostate cancer outcomes.

Citing Articles

Cancer statistics, 2025.

Siegel R, Kratzer T, Giaquinto A, Sung H, Jemal A CA Cancer J Clin. 2025; 75(1):10-45.

PMID: 39817679 PMC: 11745215. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21871.


Recent Patterns and Trends in Global Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: An Update.

Schafer E, Laversanne M, Sung H, Soerjomataram I, Briganti A, Dahut W Eur Urol. 2024; 87(3):302-313.

PMID: 39668103 PMC: 11862828. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013.


Estimation of Cancer Deaths Averted From Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Efforts, 1975-2020.

Goddard K, Feuer E, Mandelblatt J, Meza R, Holford T, Jeon J JAMA Oncol. 2024; 11(2):162-167.

PMID: 39636625 PMC: 11622066. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5381.


Dissecting the novel molecular interactions of solute carrier family 4 member 4 (SLC4A4) for prostate cancer (PCa) progression.

Rashid A, Fung H, Tang A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29133.

PMID: 39587129 PMC: 11589864. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72408-w.


Global burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, urolithiasis, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer from 1990 to 2021.

Zi H, Liu M, Luo L, Huang Q, Luo P, Luan H Mil Med Res. 2024; 11(1):64.

PMID: 39294748 PMC: 11409598. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-024-00569-w.


References
1.
Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, Warde P, Dubois J, Mirimanoff R . Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9327):103-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09408-4. View

2.
Chen M, Troncoso P, Johnston D, Tang K, Babaian R . Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol. 1997; 158(6):2168-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68188-6. View

3.
Shaw P, Etzioni R, Zeliadt S, Mariotto A, Karnofski K, Penson D . An ecologic study of prostate-specific antigen screening and prostate cancer mortality in nine geographic areas of the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160(11):1059-69. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh336. View

4.
Tsodikov A, Szabo A, Wegelin J . A population model of prostate cancer incidence. Stat Med. 2006; 25(16):2846-66. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2257. View

5.
Albertsen P . What is the value of screening for prostate cancer in the US?. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005; 2(11):536-7. DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0348. View