» Articles » PMID: 24324287

Mast Cells As a Potential Prognostic Marker in Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Dis Markers
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2013 Dec 11
PMID 24324287
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite years of intensive investigation that has been made in understanding prostate cancer, it remains one of the major men's health issues and the leading cause of death worldwide. It is now ascertained that prostate cancer emerges from multiple spontaneous and/or inherited alterations that induce changes in expression patterns of genes and proteins that function in complex networks controlling critical cellular events. It is now accepted that several innate and adaptive immune cells, including T- and B-lymphocytes, macrophages, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, and mast cells (MCs), infiltrate the prostate cancer. All of these cells are irregularly scattered within the tumor and loaded with an assorted array of cytokines, chemokines, and inflammatory and cytotoxic mediators. This complex framework reflects the diversity in tumor biology and tumor-host interactions. MCs are well-established effector cells in Immunoglobulin-E (Ig-E) associated immune responses and potent effector cells of the innate immune system; however, their clinical significance in prostate cancer is still debated. Here, these controversies are summarized, focusing on the implications of these findings in understanding the roles of MCs in primary prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Evidence of the Link between Stroma Remodeling and Prostate Cancer Prognosis.

Vecchiotti D, Clementi L, Cornacchia E, Di Vito Nolfi M, Verzella D, Capece D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39335188 PMC: 11430343. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183215.


GLIS1, Correlated with Immune Infiltrates, Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Prostate Cancer.

Peng Q, Xie T, Wang Y, Ho V, Teoh J, Chiu P Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).

PMID: 38203661 PMC: 10779070. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010489.


SNAP25 is a potential prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer.

Di L, Gu M, Wu Y, Liu G, Zhang L, Li Y Cancer Cell Int. 2022; 22(1):144.

PMID: 35392903 PMC: 8991690. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02558-2.


Molecular MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Kader A, Brangsch J, Kaufmann J, Zhao J, Mangarova D, Moeckel J Biomedicines. 2020; 9(1).

PMID: 33375045 PMC: 7822017. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9010001.


Angiogenesis Inhibition in Prostate Cancer: An Update.

Sarkar C, Goswami S, Basu S, Chakroborty D Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(9).

PMID: 32842503 PMC: 7564110. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092382.


References
1.
Nonomura N, Takayama H, Nishimura K, Oka D, Nakai Y, Shiba M . Decreased number of mast cells infiltrating into needle biopsy specimens leads to a better prognosis of prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007; 97(7):952-6. PMC: 2360404. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603962. View

2.
Taylor R, Risbridger G . Prostatic tumor stroma: a key player in cancer progression. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008; 8(6):490-7. DOI: 10.2174/156800908785699351. View

3.
Schultz C, Meier M, Schmid H . Nutrition, dietary supplements and adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Maturitas. 2011; 70(4):339-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.08.007. View

4.
Pittoni P, Tripodo C, Piconese S, Mauri G, Parenza M, Rigoni A . Mast cell targeting hampers prostate adenocarcinoma development but promotes the occurrence of highly malignant neuroendocrine cancers. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(18):5987-97. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1637. View

5.
Sigal L . Basic science for the clinician 53: mast cells. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 17(7):395-400. DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31823150b5. View