» Articles » PMID: 22975086

Randomized Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Carbohydrate Counting in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Study: is More Intensive Education Needed?

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2012 Sep 15
PMID 22975086
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Youth with type 1 diabetes do not count carbohydrates accurately, yet it is an important strategy in blood glucose control.

Objective: The study objective was to determine whether a nutrition education intervention would improve carbohydrate counting accuracy and glycemic control.

Design: We conducted a randomized, controlled nutrition intervention trial that was recruited from February 2009 to February 2010.

Subjects: Youth (12 to 18 years of age, n = 101) with type 1 diabetes were screened to identify those with poor carbohydrate counting accuracy, using a previously developed carbohydrate counting accuracy test covering commonly consumed foods and beverage items presented in six mixed meals and two snacks. All participants (n = 66, age = 15 ± 3 years, 41 male, diabetes duration = 6 ± 4 years, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] = 8.3% ± 1.1%) were randomized to the control or intervention group at the baseline visit. The intervention group attended a 90-minute class with a registered dietitian/certified diabetes educator and twice kept 3-day food records, which were used to review carbohydrate counting progress.

Main Outcome Measures: Carbohydrate counting accuracy (measured as described) and HbA1c were evaluated at baseline and 3 months to determine the effectiveness of the intervention.

Statistical Analyses Performed: t Tests, Spearman correlations, and repeated measures models were used.

Results: At baseline, carbohydrate content was over- and underestimated in 16 and 5 of 29 food items, respectively. When foods were presented as mixed meals, participants either significantly over- or underestimated 10 of the 9 meals and 4 snacks. After 3 months of follow-up, HbA1c decreased in both the intervention and control groups by -0.19% ± 0.12% (P = 0.12) and -0.08% ± 0.11% (P = 0.51), respectively; however, the overall intervention effect was not statistically significant for change in HbA1c or carbohydrate counting accuracy.

Conclusions: More intensive intervention might be required to improve adolescents' carbohydrate counting accuracy and nutrition management of type 1 diabetes. Additional research is needed to translate nutrition education into improved health outcomes.

Citing Articles

Nutritional Guidelines for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and its Adherence- A Narrative Review.

Kaushik A, Rekhi T, Puri S, Tandon N Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 28(5):461-469.

PMID: 39676782 PMC: 11642502. DOI: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_104_24.


Carbohydrate Counting: A Bibliometric Analysis with a Focus on Research.

Yilmaz Kavcar S, Kose G, Karaca Celik K, Celik A, Bas M Nutrients. 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408216 PMC: 11478275. DOI: 10.3390/nu16193249.


Assessing Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy: Current Limitations and Future Directions.

Amorim D, Miranda F, Santos A, Graca L, Rodrigues J, Rocha M Nutrients. 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39064626 PMC: 11279647. DOI: 10.3390/nu16142183.


Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard dietary care for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (The BCC Study): a randomised, controlled trial.

Ewers B, Blond M, Bruun J, Vilsboll T Nutr Diabetes. 2024; 14(1):47.

PMID: 38937460 PMC: 11211433. DOI: 10.1038/s41387-024-00307-0.


Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.

Bergmame L, Shaw S Contin Educ. 2024; 2(1):76-108.

PMID: 38774890 PMC: 11104390. DOI: 10.5334/cie.28.


References
1.
. Postprandial blood glucose. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(4):775-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.775. View

2.
Delahanty L, Halford B . The role of diet behaviors in achieving improved glycemic control in intensively treated patients in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993; 16(11):1453-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.16.11.1453. View

3.
Pankowska E, Szypowska A, Lipka M, Szpotanska M, Blazik M, Groele L . Application of novel dual wave meal bolus and its impact on glycated hemoglobin A1c level in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009; 10(5):298-303. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00471.x. View

4.
Wysocki T, Nansel T, Holmbeck G, Chen R, Laffel L, Anderson B . Collaborative involvement of primary and secondary caregivers: associations with youths' diabetes outcomes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008; 34(8):869-81. PMC: 2729681. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn136. View

5.
Smart C, Aslander-van Vliet E, Waldron S . Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009; 10 Suppl 12:100-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00572.x. View