» Articles » PMID: 22890691

Invisalign® Treatment in the Anterior Region: Were the Predicted Tooth Movements Achieved?

Overview
Journal J Orofac Orthop
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Aug 15
PMID 22890691
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Based on our previous pilot study, the objective of this extended study was to compare (a) casts to their corresponding digital ClinCheck® models at baseline and (b) the tooth movement achieved at the end of aligner therapy (Invisalign®) to the predicted movement in the anterior region.

Materials And Methods: Pre- and post-treatment casts as well as initial and final ClinChecks® models of 50 patients (15-63 years of age) were analyzed. All patients were treated with Invisalign® (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Evaluated parameters were: upper/lower anterior arch length and intercanine distance, overjet, overbite, dental midline shift, and the irregularity index according to Little. The comparison achieved/predicted tooth movement was tested for equivalence [adjusted 98.57% confidence interval (- 1.00; + 1.00)].

Results: Before treatment the anterior crowding, according to Little, was on average 5.39 mm (minimum 1.50 mm, maximum 14.50 mm) in the upper dentition and 5.96 mm (minimum 2.00 mm, maximum 11.50 mm) in the lower dentition. After treatment the values were reduced to 1.57 mm (minimum 0 mm, maximum 4.5 mm) in the maxilla and 0.82 mm (minimum 0 mm, maximum 2.50 mm) in the mandible. We found slight deviations between pretreatment casts and initialClinCheck® ranging on average from -0.08 mm (SD ± 0.29) for the overjet and up to -0.28 mm (SD ± 0.46) for the upper anterior arch length. The difference between achieved/predicted tooth movements ranged on average from 0.01 mm (SD ± 0.48) for the lower anterior arch length, up to 0.7 mm (SD ± 0.87) for the overbite. All parameters were significantly equivalent except for the overbite (-1.02; -0.39).

Conclusion: Performed with aligners (Invisalign®), the resolvement of the partly severe anterior crowding was successfully accomplished. Resolving lower anterior crowding by protrusion of the anterior teeth (i.e., enlargement of the anterior arch length) seems well predictable. The initial ClinCheck® models provided high accuracy compared to the initial casts. The achieved tooth movement was in concordance with the predicted movement for all parameters, except for the overbite.

Citing Articles

Age-stratified assessment of orthodontic tooth movement outcomes with clear aligners.

Chaluparambil M, Arqub S, Kuo C, Godoy L, Upadhyay M, Yadav S Prog Orthod. 2024; 25(1):43.

PMID: 39523241 PMC: 11551086. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-024-00542-2.


Diagnostic performance of ClinCheck, Dolphin Imaging, and 3D Slicer software for Bolton discrepancy analysis.

Teixeira Santana T, Copello F, Maranon-Vasquez G, Issamu Nojima L, Franzotti SantAnna E Angle Orthod. 2024; 95(1):51-56.

PMID: 39317378 PMC: 11662356. DOI: 10.2319/022724-156.1.


Does Invisalign Outperform Fixed Appliance in Treating Vertical Discrepancies?.

Alawdi G, Al Fahad M, Al Muzher S, Alfaifi A, Hazeem A, Dakheel R Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e65973.

PMID: 39221357 PMC: 11365740. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65973.


A Bibliometric Analysis of Clear Aligner Treatment (CAT) From 2003 to 2023.

He X, Huang Z, Yang Y, Yuan X, Wen S, Li Y Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63348.

PMID: 39077282 PMC: 11283927. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63348.


Accuracy of arch expansion with two thermoplastic materials in Invisalign® patients: EX30® and SmartTrack®.

Medeiros R, Santos R, Mendes-Miguel J, Rothier E, Mendes F, Dominguez G Dental Press J Orthod. 2024; 29(2):e2423212.

PMID: 38865514 PMC: 11163956. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.2.e2423212.oar.


References
1.
Boyd R . Surgical-orthodontic treatment of two skeletal Class III patients with Invisalign and fixed appliances. J Clin Orthod. 2005; 39(4):245-58. View

2.
Low B, Lee W, Seneviratne C, Samaranayake L, Hagg U . Ultrastructure and morphology of biofilms on thermoplastic orthodontic appliances in 'fast' and 'slow' plaque formers. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 33(5):577-83. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq126. View

3.
Kravitz N, Kusnoto B, Agran B, Viana G . Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(4):682-7. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0682:IOAAIR]2.0.CO;2. View

4.
Boyd R . Complex orthodontic treatment using a new protocol for the Invisalign appliance. J Clin Orthod. 2007; 41(9):525-47. View

5.
Giancotti A, Farina A . Treatment of collapsed arches using the invisalign system. J Clin Orthod. 2010; 44(7):416-25. View