» Articles » PMID: 37009943

Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Achieving Proclination and Intrusion of Incisors Among Class II Division 2 Patients: a Multivariate Analysis

Overview
Journal Prog Orthod
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37009943
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The predictability of incisor movement achieved by clear aligners among Class II division 2 patients is poorly understood. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the effectiveness of clear aligners in proclining and intruding upper incisors and its influencing factors.

Methods: Eligible patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion were included. For clear aligner therapy, three types of incisor movements were designed: proclination, intrusion and labial movement. Pre-treatment and post-treatment dental models were superimposed. The differences between predicted and actual (DPA) tooth movement of incisors were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate linear regression were used to analyze the potential influencing factors.

Results: A total of 51 patients and their 173 upper incisors were included. Actual incisor proclination and intrusion were less than predicted ones (both P < 0.001), while actual labial movement was greater than predicted one (P < 0.001). Predictability of incisor proclination and intrusion was 69.8% and 53.3%, respectively. Multivariate linear regression revealed that DPA of proclination was significantly positively associated with predicted proclination (B = 0.174, P < 0.001), ipsilateral premolar extraction (B = 2.773, P < 0.001) and ipsilateral canine proclination (B = 1.811, P < 0.05), while negatively associated with molar distalization (B = - 2.085, P < 0.05). The DPA of intrusion was significantly positively correlated with predicted intrusion (B = 0.556, P < 0.001) while negatively associated with labial mini-implants (B = - 1.466, P < 0.001). The DPA of labial movement was significantly positively associated with predicted labial movement (B = 0.481, P < 0.001), while negatively correlated with molar distalization (B = - 1.004, P < 0.001), labial mini-implants (B = - 0.738, P < 0.001) and age (B = - 0.486, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: For Class II division 2 patients, predicted incisor proclination (69.8%) and intrusion (53.3%) are partially achieved with clear aligner therapy. Excessive labial movement (0.7 mm) of incisors may be achieved. Incisor movement is influenced by predicted movement amount, premolar extraction, canine proclination, molar distalization, mini-implants and age.

Citing Articles

Expert consensus on the clinical strategies for orthodontic treatment with clear aligners.

Wang Y, Long H, Zhao Z, Bai D, Han X, Wang J Int J Oral Sci. 2025; 17(1):19.

PMID: 40074738 PMC: 11904224. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-025-00350-2.


Biomechanical analysis of clear aligners for mandibular anterior teeth intrusion and its clinical application in the design of new aligner attachment.

Xiao S, Cheng C, Li H, Li L, Shen C, Feng Q Prog Orthod. 2025; 26(1):11.

PMID: 40059251 PMC: 11891119. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-025-00557-3.


Teenage Patients with Class II Subdivision Treated with Aligners and Elastics: A Retrospective Study.

Quinzi V, Conigliaro A, Fani E, Meme L, Fiasca F, Carugo N Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768968 PMC: 11678840. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122089.


An Evaluation of the Estimated Aligners Needed to Correct Malocclusion Traits Using Invisalign ClinCheck™ Pro Software: A Retrospective Study.

Rincon-Gregor I, Bautista-Rojas C, Trejo-Ake E, Zuniga-Herrera I, Herrera-Atoche J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518691 PMC: 11546783. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216552.


A Bibliometric Analysis of Clear Aligner Treatment (CAT) From 2003 to 2023.

He X, Huang Z, Yang Y, Yuan X, Wen S, Li Y Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63348.

PMID: 39077282 PMC: 11283927. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63348.


References
1.
Hahn W, Zapf A, Dathe H, Fialka-Fricke J, Fricke-Zech S, Gruber R . Torquing an upper central incisor with aligners--acting forces and biomechanical principles. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(6):607-13. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq007. View

2.
Jiang T, Jiang Y, Chu F, Lu P, Tang G . A cone-beam computed tomographic study evaluating the efficacy of incisor movement with clear aligners: Assessment of incisor pure tipping, controlled tipping, translation, and torque. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159(5):635-643. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.025. View

3.
Kravitz N, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B . How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018. View

4.
Krieger E, Seiferth J, Marinello I, Jung B, Wriedt S, Jacobs C . Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region: were the predicted tooth movements achieved?. J Orofac Orthop. 2012; 73(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-012-0097-9. View

5.
Komiya T, Powell E, Vu C, Guddati A . Role of T0 status in overall survival for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A NCDB analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 148:8-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.021. View