» Articles » PMID: 22741075

Corneal Biometry from Volumetric SDOCT and Comparison with Existing Clinical Modalities

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jun 29
PMID 22741075
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a comparison of corneal biometric values from dense volumetric spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) scans to reference values in both phantoms and clinical subjects. We also present a new optically based "keratometric equivalent power" formula for SDOCT that eliminates previously described discrepancies between corneal power form SDOCT and existing clinical modalities. Phantom objects of varying radii of curvature and corneas of normal subjects were imaged with a clinical SDOCT system. The optically corrected three-dimensional surfaces were used to recover radii of curvature and power as appropriate. These were then compared to the manufacturer's reference values in phantoms and to measurements from topography and Scheimpflug photography in subjects. In phantom objects, paired differences between SDOCT and reference values for radii of curvature were not statistically significant. In subjects, there were no significant paired differences between SDOCT and reference values from the other modalities for anterior radius and corneal keratometric power. In contrast to other studies, we found that dense volumetric scans with available SDOCT can be used to recover corneal biometric values-including power-that correspond well with existing clinical measurements.

Citing Articles

Effect of fixational eye movements in corneal topography measurements with optical coherence tomography.

de Castro A, Martinez-Enriquez E, Marcos S Biomed Opt Express. 2023; 14(5):2138-2152.

PMID: 37206127 PMC: 10191639. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.486460.


Biometric Measurement of Anterior Segment: A Review.

Liu B, Kang C, Fang F Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(15).

PMID: 32752014 PMC: 7435894. DOI: 10.3390/s20154285.


Topography and pachymetry maps for mouse corneas using optical coherence tomography.

Liu A, Brown D, Conn R, McNabb R, Pardue M, Kuo A Exp Eye Res. 2019; 190:107868.

PMID: 31704241 PMC: 6961820. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107868.


Accurate tissue interface segmentation via adversarial pre-segmentation of anterior segment OCT images.

Ouyang J, Mathai T, Lathrop K, Galeotti J Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(10):5291-5324.

PMID: 31646047 PMC: 6788614. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.005291.


Wide-field whole eye OCT system with demonstration of quantitative retinal curvature estimation.

McNabb R, Polans J, Keller B, Jackson-Atogi M, James C, Vann R Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(1):338-355.

PMID: 30775104 PMC: 6363197. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.000338.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Royston J, Dunne M, Barnes D . Measurement of the posterior corneal radius using slit lamp and Purkinje image techniques. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990; 10(4):385-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1990.tb00886.x. View

3.
Holladay J, Hill W, Steinmueller A . Corneal power measurements using scheimpflug imaging in eyes with prior corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(10):862-8. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090917-07. View

4.
Ortiz S, Siedlecki D, Perez-Merino P, Chia N, de Castro A, Szkulmowski M . Corneal topography from spectral optical coherence tomography (sOCT). Biomed Opt Express. 2011; 2(12):3232-47. PMC: 3233243. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.2.003232. View

5.
Prospero Ponce C, Rocha K, Smith S, Krueger R . Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(6):1055-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.022. View