» Articles » PMID: 19835326

Corneal Power Measurements Using Scheimpflug Imaging in Eyes with Prior Corneal Refractive Surgery

Overview
Journal J Refract Surg
Date 2009 Oct 20
PMID 19835326
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of central corneal power measurements by Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) for eyes that had corneal refractive surgery.

Methods: This study comprised two groups: a pilot group of 100 eyes with prior hyperopic or myopic LASIK that did not have cataract surgery, and a test group of 41 eyes with prior radial keratotomy (RK) and cataract surgery. In the pilot group, Pentacam images and refraction were taken preoperatively and 3 months after LASIK. The historical method was used to compute the theoretical postoperative keratometry (K) -reading and then compared to the measured equivalent K-reading (EKR) from the Pentacam. The EKR is the same value measured by standard keratometry or topography on the front surface, adjusted for the effect of the back surface power difference from normal. In the test group of RK eyes, the postoperative refraction and EKR were measured 3 months after cataract surgery. The Holladay IOL Consultant Program was used to back-calculate the theoretical K-reading. The EKR measurements were then compared to the back-calculated corneal power.

Results: The optimal zone sample size was determined to be 4.5 mm for the pilot group. The mean prediction error for this group was -0.06+/-0.56 diopters (D) (range: -1.63 to +/-1.34 D). Using the 4.5-mm zone determined in the pilot group, the EKR value for the test group of 41 RK eyes had a mean prediction error of -0.04+/-0.94 D (range: -1.84 to +/-2.27 D).

Conclusions: When historical refractive data are not available, Scheimpflug imaging with the Pentacam provides an alternative method of measuring the central corneal power in eyes that previously received corneal refractive surgery.

Citing Articles

Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery.

Gupta V, Pal H, Sawhney S, Aggarwal A, Vanathi M, Luthra G Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(1):29-43.

PMID: 38131567 PMC: 10841781. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1219_23.


Comparison of total corneal power measurements obtained with different devices after myopic keratorefractive surgery.

Wang Z, Song Y, Yang W, Liu Q, Li Y, Cui R Int J Ophthalmol. 2023; 16(7):1117-1122.

PMID: 37465503 PMC: 10333248. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.07.17.


Predicting Residual Astigmatism in Cataract Surgery.

Kawahara A Vision (Basel). 2022; 6(4).

PMID: 36548932 PMC: 9785719. DOI: 10.3390/vision6040070.


Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery.

Karmiris E, Gartaganis P, Ntravalias T, Manousakis E, Giannakis I, Chalkiadaki E Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022; 36(2):229-236.

PMID: 36211320 PMC: 9535920. DOI: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_138_21.


An Analysis of Scheimpflug Holladay-Equivalent Keratometry Readings Following Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking.

Saglik A, Celik H, Aksoy M Beyoglu Eye J. 2022; 4(2):62-68.

PMID: 35187435 PMC: 8842049. DOI: 10.14744/bej.2019.35220.